he's not supposed to be injured. It was a sickness bug that kept him out last week allegedly. Bad news him missing as this will add fuel to speculation re him wanting a release. Also bad timing with us not having option of giving southernwood a go. Kearney will have to play in halves as combinations we've tried last few weeks just arent working. one off reardon/halley to fullback with other on wing and wardle in for platt. Think we need to give crossley a go too off bench.
he's not supposed to be injured. It was a sickness bug that kept him out last week allegedly. Bad news him missing as this will add fuel to speculation re him wanting a release. Also bad timing with us not having option of giving southernwood a go. Kearney will have to play in halves as combinations we've tried last few weeks just arent working. one off reardon/halley to fullback with other on wing and wardle in for platt. Think we need to give crossley a go too off bench.
If we take the assumption that the sickness report is correct (and I appreciate a lot of people aren't going to believe it), then it must be a pretty bad illness he's got and perhaps it's worth wishing him a speedy recovery from it.
bit too big an ask to expect langley to come back from a longish injury and play full game at Loose. Expect menzies to stay at loose and langley to be used as a bench prop to ease him back in.wardle to cover for platt imo. Other option would be to move sykes to Centre and use addy alongside kearney which was the halves combo in friendlies and imo addy looked a lot better alongside kearney than he has done alongside sykes.
bit too big an ask to expect langley to come back from a longish injury and play full game at Loose. Expect menzies to stay at loose and langley to be used as a bench prop to ease him back in.wardle to cover for platt imo. Other option would be to move sykes to Centre and use addy alongside kearney which was the halves combo in friendlies and imo addy looked a lot better alongside kearney than he has done alongside sykes.
Never said he was gonna play a full game at Loose. I would expect him to start though. We usually spell a backrower at around the 20/25 minute mark, so will probably be him that goes off first.
Never said he was gonna play a full game at Loose. I would expect him to start though. We usually spell a backrower at around the 20/25 minute mark, so will probably be him that goes off first.
normally I'd agree with that, but in absence of lynch, langley is the 2nd rower most likely to move up into props and give us a bit of bulk in pack imo. Dont like idea of worrincy propping and doubt we'll see crossley given a go.
That said I'd prefer us to put langley straight back into his 2nd row position as weve missed his defence on that side.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bullsmad and 103 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...