Re: clearing the ruck : Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:45 am  

Should just treat it as a knock on when they've thrown it into the man moving away.

Re: clearing the ruck : Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:03 pm  

davey37 wrote:

That Josh Jones one tonight was far worse than any last week.

He actually threw it forward to hit Brough.

It should of been awarded as a knock on. Surely can only be a forward pass if his own player catches it. Really hope they clamp down on this. It's like our version of a footballer going down in the box just because there's contact.

Re: clearing the ruck : Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:02 pm  

Good news: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rf ... esmanship/

Good news: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rf ... esmanship/

Re: clearing the ruck : Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:06 pm  

shauney wrote: Good news: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rf ... esmanship/ Per the article, if Jones of Salford passed the ball forward into Brough, why wasn't the first offence of a forward pass pinged??

shauney wrote: Good news: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rf ... esmanship/ Per the article, if Jones of Salford passed the ball forward into Brough, why wasn't the first offence of a forward pass pinged??

Re: clearing the ruck : Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:25 pm  

Mild mannered Janitor wrote:

Per the article, if Jones of Salford passed the ball forward into Brough, why wasn't the first offence of a forward pass pinged??

Exactly.

Very poor decision by Child that one.

Re: clearing the ruck : Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:34 pm  

I haven't seen it, but it should always be based on which offence happened first.
I would have thought Brough was interfering with play before the forward pass.