CCJ : Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:13 pm  

Has anybody seen this? http://www.salfordstar.com Seems to be bad news after bad news at the minute! Apparently this has been ongoing for quite some time yet the club never addressed it?

Has anybody seen this? http://www.salfordstar.com Seems to be bad news after bad news at the minute! Apparently this has been ongoing for quite some time yet the club never addressed it?

Re: CCJ : Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:21 pm  

Interesting choice of first post Bob.

Re: CCJ : Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:08 pm  

Talent Spotter wrote:

Interesting choice of first post Bob.

You beat me to it TS

Re: CCJ : Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:32 pm  

Some very confusing (or confused)language in that article. A CCJ is not "served", a judgement is, by definition, passed down by a judge.

A summons, however, is served but it is by no means a guarantee that judgement will be made for the plaintiff. There is also mention that the club may contest this "CCJ" but again a judgement is final and cannot be contested. All of which leads me to believe that Kooga have simply summoned the club to a court hearing.

This in itself is not an indication of an inability to pay, many invoices are disputed for many reasons at which time the creditor may decide to instigate court proceedings. Indeed I myself am likely to instigate proceedings against a company shortly, the communications between us have been amicable but ultimately I believe they owe me money, they disagree with me!

I suspect that the Salford Star are well aware of all the points I've made but it suits their agenda better to make it look like judgement has already been passed.

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:16 am  

Salford Star being needlessly controversial? Never!

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:27 am  

More guff I see.

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 9:08 am  

Yorkshire_Red wrote:

Some very confusing (or confused)language in that article. A CCJ is not "served", a judgement is, by definition, passed down by a judge.

A summons, however, is served but it is by no means a guarantee that judgement will be made for the plaintiff. There is also mention that the club may contest this "CCJ" but again a judgement is final and cannot be contested. All of which leads me to believe that Kooga have simply summoned the club to a court hearing.

This in itself is not an indication of an inability to pay, many invoices are disputed for many reasons at which time the creditor may decide to instigate court proceedings. Indeed I myself am likely to instigate proceedings against a company shortly, the communications between us have been amicable but ultimately I believe they owe me money, they disagree with me!

I suspect that the Salford Star are well aware of all the points I've made but it suits their agenda better to make it look like judgement has already been passed.

It would be nice to know the facts on this. I'm already seeing websites, forums and tweets going on about how the club has a CCJ against them on the back of this story - when we don't even know if any judgement has actually been made.

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:00 am  

From the OFFICIAL registers for court judgments... NOTHING is registered.

I searched and got the following result;


Detailed Report for : SALFORD CITY REDS (2013) LIMITED
England and Wales Orders & Judgments
NOTHING REGISTERED

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:14 am  

Why let the facts get in the way of a good story?

The Star through and through.

They might as well just come out and say they are a mouthpiece of Agent Garrido.

Re: CCJ : Fri Sep 19, 2014 6:15 pm  

MEN have the story. £35k or its bailiffs