Quote Mild Rover="Mild Rover"To be fair, for objective assessments based on data, why would IMG need to visit any club?
It’s not like last time with the independent assessments when somebody presumably mooched around Odsal, had lunch, decided SL needs Bradford… “B?”
This has got to be better than a system influenced by whether a Club Chairman and assessor have a shared interest in philately or fondness for pickled eggs or go back years and years.
(To be fair, even if the criteria raised a few suspicions last time, the assessments themselves didn’t cause it to fail).'"
Simple answer is IMGs data can be flawed and they should be visiting all the clubs they are rating
Given that this is a sport played at a stadium or ground as it is at your club,it should be imperative that they visit the clubs facilities particularly when you play in a three sided ground with an open end now filled with street food vendors,made out to be an exciting development when its just an excuse for not developing a new stand or standing area.
If IMG have not seen this then they should.
Think what would happen to the rating of Leeds if they decided to remove the open end standing area and fill it with street food vendors.
If your point of why would IMG need to visit any club then HKR is a prime example and i think you got lucky
