WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - GAME ON : Wakefield Trinity v Warrington Wolves - 19:45:00

Board index Welcome to RLFANS The Virtual Terrace GAME ON : Wakefield Trinity v Warrington Wolves - 19:45:00


User avatarTowns88 wrote:
Towns88 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:34 pm
Posts: 4384
moxi1 wrote:
It’s a weak argument as to why they’re getting steamrolled this evening. I’d still snap your hand off to swap my teams injury situation



Yeah you're right to an extent but you're wrong saying they just had 3 out. Take 6 out of most teams and match them up against a hot saints / wire side and you'll get the top 2 winning , though I agree they should be disappointed with the 28 conceded in 42 minutes. I didn't expect trinity to win tonight but thought they'd be more competitive.
"I'm sorry, but I would hope that we would beat Cas with a 1 day turnaround."

An arrogant Wigan fan a few days before we stuffed them 18-4 at the JJB.

User avatarmoxi1 wrote:
moxi1 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 3866
AS108 wrote:
Huddersfield’s injury problems are completely irrelevant to my point and how is having 7 players missing a weak argument as to why they’re getting steamrolled? That is hands down the most ridiculous post I’ve read.


Huddersfield are another team with a lot of injuries yes. How’s it now 7 injuries? And do these 7 injured players get in to the match day squad?
fun time frankie Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 6:48 pm
Posts: 7194
Location: east east hull
AS108 wrote:
Huddersfield’s injury problems are completely irrelevant to my point and how is having 7 players missing a weak argument as to why they’re getting steamrolled? That is hands down the most ridiculous post I’ve read.

Before you start calling posts ridiculous get your facts right he’s not a Huddersfield fan so not referring to there injury list

AS108 wrote:
AS108 Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 12:40 pm
Posts: 1024
fun time frankie wrote:
Before you start calling posts ridiculous get your facts right he’s not a Huddersfield fan so not referring to there injury list


Given he keeps banging on about his teams terrible injury list I assumed that team was Huddersfield given they have got a terrible injury list and could only name an 18 man squad. Whoever he supports is irrelevant anyway as it has nothing to do with Wakefield having a lot of players missing.

User avatarmoxi1 wrote:
moxi1 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 3866
Tupou and Johnstone are obvious huge misses, I’ll give wakey that. Any team would miss that strike power, but the other lot are easy replaceable if you’ve a good squad of players. It’s annoying that teams use the injury card as an excuse so much when other teams have far worse problems.

We (rovers) should’ve beat cats last Sunday, could quite easily of used the injury card for the reason we was beat, but in reality it was poor game management that cost us again.

User avatarmoxi1 wrote:
moxi1 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 3866
AS108 wrote:
Given he keeps banging on about his teams terrible injury list I assumed that team was Huddersfield given they have got a terrible injury list and could only name an 18 man squad. Whoever he supports is irrelevant anyway as it has nothing to do with Wakefield having a lot of players missing.


So they’re getting beat because of injuries. Poor squad then - end of discussion.
fun time frankie Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 6:48 pm
Posts: 7194
Location: east east hull
AS108 wrote:
Given he keeps banging on about his teams terrible injury list I assumed that team was Huddersfield given they have got a terrible injury list and could only name an 18 man squad. Whoever he supports is irrelevant anyway as it has nothing to do with Wakefield having a lot of players missing.

How many of the 7 missing players would be in the starting 17 personally I’d say 3
einstien said insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again but expects a different result

User avatarTowns88 wrote:
Towns88 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:34 pm
Posts: 4384
fun time frankie wrote:
How many of the 7 missing players would be in the starting 17 personally I’d say 3


Probsbly 6. Kirmond the debatable one but TJ and BT for Arundel and Jowitt. Ashurst for crowther, Randall for hirst and play with 2 9s and huby for England. Some may say kirmond for horo too.
"I'm sorry, but I would hope that we would beat Cas with a 1 day turnaround."

An arrogant Wigan fan a few days before we stuffed them 18-4 at the JJB.

User avatarTowns88 wrote:
Towns88 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:34 pm
Posts: 4384
Unreal comeback trinity :BOW:
"I'm sorry, but I would hope that we would beat Cas with a 1 day turnaround."

An arrogant Wigan fan a few days before we stuffed them 18-4 at the JJB.

AS108 wrote:
AS108 Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 12:40 pm
Posts: 1024
That’s an unbelievable effort by Wakefield, fair play. As for Warrington, a massively overrated team and that was a pretty shocking collapse.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Egg Chasing and 102 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to The Virtual Terrace


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
5,070,6691,57978,2134,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and fixtures and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
Please Support RLFANS.COM


YOU HAVE RL FIXTURES OFF
RLFANS Recent Posts