Re: Drop Makinson for Johnstone? : Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:51 pm  

Another outstanding game with a couple of tries from Makinson he might just sneak the Golden Boot Award, we.ve not had may british players with that accolade, so give it a go Tommy.

Re: Drop Makinson for Johnstone? : Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:57 pm  

Bennett will keep the same team, unless there is an injury or a ban to Burgess and rightly so. It's a test match and caps should be earned not given away. Makinson was class at the weekend but he himself may find himself out the team come next year if Hall plays well in Sydney.Johnstone is knocking on the door and his time will come. We should embrace the fact we have around half a dozen world class or potential world class wingers.

Re: Drop Makinson for Johnstone? : Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:57 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Another outstanding game with a couple of tries from Makinson he might just sneak the Golden Boot Award, we.ve not had may british players with that accolade, so give it a go Tommy.

If that was to happen Makinson would join the great Kevin Sinfield. It’s a tough ask as a winger. Has a winger ever won the award?

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:17 pm  

I’m sorry if I’ve upset you sake slim. I was just replying to a wakefield poster. I will make sure if I don’t agree with something that someone says on here I refrain from posting in case you get offended

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:37 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

So Vastman can say they are better wingers in SL and another poster isn’t allowed to name one without it being trolling? That’s ridiculous and whilst those few posters are guilty of trolling on many other occasions this wasn’t one of them, you’ve just seen the posters name and decided it was based on that and not what was written which is a fair argument.

When Michael Carter’s name wasn’t on the best owner thread Waley fans kicked off insisting his name should be mentioned and it was trolling not including it. Now Wakefield fan says they’re much better wingers in SL and when someone mentions one it’s trolling to bring their name up? What ridiculous hypocrisy. Just blaming him for a thread derailment when it was mostly caused by Wakey fans critical of Makinson because someone dare rate a winger that isn’t one of their own.

So what if vastman said there were loads of flying wingers in SL better than Uate, it doesn't have bugger all to do with that dude chipping in with his obvious baiting post, if you can't see that it's more to do with the chip on your shoulder about Trinity you've had for the past season or so. The funny thing is I bet vastman was including Makinson in that list of better SL flyers as he put it.
Also before that post, I had no reason to think he was anything other than a genuine poster, so you're completely wrong on the play the post not poster bull. ATEOTD there was no thread derailemnt till that post, Vastman commneted about Huddersfields signing which is on topic, then two others did what you're accusing me of hypictrically, they played the poster and not the post and went off on a tangent.

Anyway this has gone way beyond boring now.

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:52 pm  

Wakefield fans really are a strange strange breed.

For the record I'd have Makinson in my side over Johnstone any day of the week. Better all round player.

I doubt Johnstone would've stopped the tries Makinson stopped on Sunday plus TM can play centre or full back too.

Johnstone will get his time though given his age.

Re: Drop Makinson for Johnstone? : Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:53 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

Bennett will keep the same team, unless there is an injury or a ban to Burgess and rightly so. It's a test match and caps should be earned not given away. Makinson was class at the weekend but he himself may find himself out the team come next year if Hall plays well in Sydney.Johnstone is knocking on the door and his time will come. We should embrace the fact we have around half a dozen world class or potential world class wingers.

And as a Trinity fan I agree and so do so many many others funnily enough.

So I take it this isn't a bait thread with just the job of getting a rise out of one set of fans?

This place does make me laugh though, you'd think Trinity was the first team over the decades that wanted their player in instead of a player on another side, especially when they're both top players. I remember all the arguments over who was going to get picked between Wigan, Saints, Leeds and Bradford fans back in the day, relatively small fry nowadays.

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:03 pm  

Shifty Cat wrote:

So what if vastman said there were loads of flying wingers in SL better than Uate, it doesn't have bugger all to do with that dude chipping in with his obvious baiting post

Why is praising Makinson baiting?

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:16 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Why is praising Makinson baiting?

LOL why bring Makinson up in a new signing thread? Start a new one about him, if he wanted to call him the best winger in SL and all that. The point was that's where the thread became derailed and is all i pointed out, If you can't see it for what it is, I care less at this point.

Re: "The Tommy Makinson/Tom Johnstone Love in - fill your bo : Tue Nov 06, 2018 9:13 pm  

JonnoTheGreat wrote:

Wakefield fans really are a strange strange breed.

For the record I'd have Makinson in my side over Johnstone any day of the week. Better all round player.

I doubt Johnstone would've stopped the tries Makinson stopped on Sunday plus TM can play centre or full back too.

Johnstone will get his time though given his age.

You’ve proven yourself to be an idiot and probably affiliated with Jean and Kev as well