WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Who will replace Widnes: Toronto, Toulouse or London?

Board index Welcome to RLFANS The Virtual Terrace Who will replace Widnes: Toronto, Toulouse or London?

Posted by Call Me God on Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:37 pm
Call Me God User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 945
Rep Position: 6th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:14 am
Posts: 2921
Budgiezilla wrote:
:SHOOT: :SHOOT: :SHOOT: :SHOOT: :SHOOT:


Sorry, but he's right.

If we'd stuck with licences, Wales and quite possibly Bradford would have folded and imploded, to be replaced by "in all probability" Leigh and Fev or Fax. Del Boy would have been able to invest in other things other than trying to buy a place in SL and we'd have a 14 team SL with 2 new applications from Toronto and Toulouse to consider, resulting in 16 Professional full time sides.......no matter what structure you choose, chances are one of Wigan Saints or Leeds will feature in the Grand Final, but the steps Widnes made during licencing show what can be done once clubs stop spending money just to survive and get another hand out.....London really started to invest in the youth during licensing and because of that, we have a gaggle of home grown talet at the club now.....the return of Jeopardy has lasted 4 years....and soon it'll be 1 up/1 down with players swapping clubs as they pass each other.....
...and the loser in the coin flip between Fev and Fax for the last licence spot? Who cares? Sport is now a business and you either need 10k home fans or a sugar daddy.....so probably Fax, because Fev are drinking from a very crowded and busy well with Castleford and Wakefield already in the town and Halifax have show themselves to be more fiscally astute.

So, to be clear. If we'd stuck with licencing, Crusaders and Bradford would still have gone under and Leigh would now be in SL...... :SUBMISSION:
JESUS WEPT :WALL: HOW MANY TIMES?????
£20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000.
The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.

There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them. :BEAT:
Posted by Sir Kevin Sinfield on Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:39 am
Sir Kevin Sinfield Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 786
Rep Position: 11th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:57 am
Posts: 3546
JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:
But we need London, along with Toulouse and Toronto, to be confirmed in Super League by 2022, so we can get a more lucrative contract from Sky to start in 2022, and possibly a good contract from BeIN Sports and perhaps from Canadian television as well.

The non m62 clubs are vital for the game and should be given protection from relegation in Super League. This would help us to negotiate a strong tv deal in the UK, France and Canada.
Posted by Clearwing on Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:48 am
Clearwing User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 581
Rep Position: 23rd / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 7457
wire-quin wrote:
I've said it before, we need to go back to franchising and set out standards for each club...reserve grade, youth development(maybe X number in squad), finance, facilities.....


All good suggestions, the issue is as ever cash. The RFL/SL cannot insist on businesses implementing all these things unless they can put the funding on the table to cover it. They can't (I'm under no illusion that Elstone will fare any better than everyone else who's tried and may even do worse). What we'll end up with is a botched version with plenty of corners cut/blind eyes turned. Again.
"Look, I'd never use injuries as an excuse..." Daryl Powell
Posted by Willzay on Thu Sep 20, 2018 6:47 am
Willzay User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 792
Rep Position: 10th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:58 pm
Posts: 8875
Despite what the lunatics say, Toronto/Toulouse are not vital for the future of the game.
Id clean up RLFANS in 5 minutes.

Troll hitlist :

Jean Capdouze

Sir Kev/My Mate Ronnie

Lebron/Ruune Rebellion

Jonno
Posted by wrencat1873 on Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:39 am
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 1127
Rep Position: 2nd / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 12423
Sir Kevin Sinfield wrote:
The non m62 clubs are vital for the game and should be given protection from relegation in Super League. This would help us to negotiate a strong tv deal in the UK, France and Canada.


Wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong again !

IF "our" negotiating hand would be so strong with their inclusion, why is it that we have just had yet another restructure and not included any of them in SL.
The effect of the overseas expansion clubs to assist in improving the TV deal is zero, nil, zip, feck all.
How many additional Sky subscriptions will be sold in N.America / France if these clubs enter SL ??

IF there was a successful, well supported New York side plus competition form another 6/8 N.American clubs, then, MAYBE there could be something in it. However, this would also see the end of professional RL in the UK, which is a strange dream to chase. Turkeys and Christmas spring to mind.
Posted by Lebron James on Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:42 am
Lebron James Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 204
Rep Position: 123rd / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 9:32 pm
Posts: 1946
Willzay wrote:
Despite what the lunatics say, Toronto/Toulouse are not vital for the future of the game.


Yes they are.

Regards

King James
Superleague Titles
Warrington Wolfs - 0
Wakefield Trinity - 0
Leigh Centurions - 0

Budgiezilla wrote:
Surely it can only be a player from Catalans. Probably the best RL side I have ever witnessed in this season's comp.
Posted by Kennedy on Thu Sep 20, 2018 12:53 pm
Kennedy User avatar
Eddie Hemmings's Wig
Eddie Hemmings's Wig

Reputation Points: 128
Rep Position: 176th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:25 pm
Posts: 220
Call Me God wrote:
Sorry, but he's right.

If we'd stuck with licences, Wales and quite possibly Bradford would have folded and imploded, to be replaced by "in all probability" Leigh and Fev or Fax. Del Boy would have been able to invest in other things other than trying to buy a place in SL and we'd have a 14 team SL with 2 new applications from Toronto and Toulouse to consider, resulting in 16 Professional full time sides.......no matter what structure you choose, chances are one of Wigan Saints or Leeds will feature in the Grand Final, but the steps Widnes made during licencing show what can be done once clubs stop spending money just to survive and get another hand out.....London really started to invest in the youth during licensing and because of that, we have a gaggle of home grown talet at the club now.....the return of Jeopardy has lasted 4 years....and soon it'll be 1 up/1 down with players swapping clubs as they pass each other.....
...and the loser in the coin flip between Fev and Fax for the last licence spot? Who cares? Sport is now a business and you either need 10k home fans or a sugar daddy.....so probably Fax, because Fev are drinking from a very crowded and busy well with Castleford and Wakefield already in the town and Halifax have show themselves to be more fiscally astute.

So, to be clear. If we'd stuck with licencing, Crusaders and Bradford would still have gone under and Leigh would now be in SL...... :SUBMISSION:


nice speech are you an MP by any chance ?
Posted by RoyBoy29 on Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:47 pm
RoyBoy29 User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 415
Rep Position: 49th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 8:29 am
Posts: 1620
Sir Kevin Sinfield wrote:
The non m62 clubs are vital for the game and should be given protection from relegation in Super League. This would help us to negotiate a strong tv deal in the UK, France and Canada.



Why should they be given protection?
Irony is represented below.

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:
He is not telling the truth. He is talking paranoid rubbish.
Posted by Sir Kevin Sinfield on Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:43 pm
Sir Kevin Sinfield Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 786
Rep Position: 11th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:57 am
Posts: 3546
To enable us to negotiate a strong multi year tv deal in the UK, France and Canada. Tv networks are only interested in showing the top league, hence no Championship RL is on tv (other than Toronto who currently film their own games for Canadian and British networks to spread RL throughout Ontario and Canada)

French and Canadian networks won’t want to sign up to showing RL when their team/teams could be relegated from the top tier.

We will all be better off financially if French and Canadian clubs are guaranteed Super League status.
Posted by Budgiezilla on Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:45 pm
Budgiezilla User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 717
Rep Position: 16th / 77,889

Quiz Score: 224

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 7756
Location: Sefton Street, Leigh
Sir Kevin Sinfield wrote:
To enable us to negotiate a strong multi year tv deal in the UK, France and Canada. Tv networks are only interested in showing the top league, hence no Championship RL is on tv (other than Toronto who currently film their own games for Canadian and British networks to spread RL throughout Ontario and Canada)

French and Canadian networks won’t want to sign up to showing RL when their team/teams could be relegated from the top tier.

We will all be better off financially if French and Canadian clubs are guaranteed Super League status.


:lol: you don't half type some cr@p !
"I know you've had a bad day, but there's no need to take it out on me"
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beverley red, Biff Tannen, bramleyrhino, CM Punk, Google Adsense [Bot], homme vaste, Karen, little wayne69, Marvin Goolash, roopy, Shazbaz, SpainesRoadFartown, Ste100Centurions, TheButcher, tonyblaidd, warriorweed, Wilde 3, Willzay and 180 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to The Virtual Terrace


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,977,8301,80577,8894,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
TOMORROW 07:30
GB
PNG
v
GB LIONS
Thu 30th Jan 19:45
SL
WIGAN WARRIORS
v
WARRINGTON
Fri 31st Jan 19:45
SL
HULL KR
v
WAKEFIELD
Fri 31st Jan 19:45
SL
ST.HELENS
v
SALFORD
Sat 1st Feb 17:00
SL
CATALAN DRAGONS
v
HUDDERSFIELD
Sun 2nd Feb 14:30
SL
TORONTO
v
CASTLEFORD
Sun 2nd Feb 16:45
SL
LEEDS RHINOS
v
HULL FC
Thu 6th Feb 19:45
SL
WARRINGTON
v
ST.HELENS
Fri 7th Feb 19:45
SL
CASTLEFORD
v
WIGAN WARRIORS
Fri 7th Feb 19:45
SL
HULL FC
v
HULL KR
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)