: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:31 pm  

MrPhilb wrote: So you can't actually dicipher which part Gene touched be it his eyes or his nose yet it was a trade mark gouge? According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene."

MrPhilb wrote: So you can't actually dicipher which part Gene touched be it his eyes or his nose yet it was a trade mark gouge? According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene."

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:33 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

He may have noticed Webb had an extremly large bogey and thought he would help him breathe by removing it.

Ah ok, ive heard theyre an speciality dish in PNG. I'll let him off then, he was obviously starving.

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:33 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote: According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene." Tell you what the man is as hard as nails, respect

Mrs Barista wrote: According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene." Tell you what the man is as hard as nails, respect

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:34 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote: According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene." Objectivity comes to the arguement. And agrees with us.

Mrs Barista wrote: According to The Times, anyway (photo not for the squeamish): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/rugby_league/article6840837.ece "Brent Webb was penalised for retaliating after appearing to have his face gouged by Stanley Gene." Objectivity comes to the arguement. And agrees with us.

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:34 pm  

knocker norton wrote:

No no it was a totally legit tackle Brent Webb just enjoys 'going off on one' for no apparent reason! Stan is the innocent party here.

He touched his face, looked like his nose if i'm honest. He got the reaction he wanted from Webb, it certainly wasn't a gouge but you have to question his intentions

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:34 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

Tell you what the man is as hard as nails, respect

I'd have been crying my eyes out!!

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:45 pm  

HAPPY DAYS.

Re: HKR - bravery and resilience in the face of adversity. : Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:50 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

You wanna point your trolls to 'sense alley' by any chance?
They seem to have decide that 'lunatic lane' is a much better place to be.

Pots and kettles sunshine

: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:54 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

You have play the cards you are dealt and do your best. We've been lucky with injuries up to now, but our luck ran out. As I say - no complaints... or regrets. If you aren't good enough, and we weren't tonight, you can only ask for effort and I think the Rovers team gave that.

sadly lacking be our mob through the season.

rovers have done well this season but are not a great side by any means. Still credit where it is due and cannot fault the effort, which as a supporter is all I want to see

Re: HKR - bravery and resilience in the face of adversity. : Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:58 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Ill post a recap of the conversation as you seem to have forgotten what you said
Please explain how if you are as sure as you were when you posted why you wont take what you obviously class as a sure thing?
Unless you are.
A. Talking you usual line of horse sh**
B. have no stones
Which is it stoneless?

Got less brain cells than b0llocks that lad.

Quite a feat when you consider he's a eunuch.