Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:31 pm Posts: 11585 Location: The Hamptons of East Yorkshire
Not bagging him by any stretch. Always seemed a steady Eddie type to me. Probably do a job if a game was wrapped up but think Fash would show a bit more dynamism interjecting with Houghton as has been mooted.
Don’t see the point in letting Litten go and then signing Cunningham?? Unless your going to sign a quality hooker and spell Houghton at hooker and maybe drop him into loose forward at times then I don’t see the point. Litten is maybe a little small but tbf he hasn’t been given much of a crack in the first team to judge his ability
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2003 2:48 am Posts: 19989 Location: Back in Hull.
hansoloishere wrote:
Don’t see the point in letting Litten go and then signing Cunningham?? Unless your going to sign a quality hooker and spell Houghton at hooker and maybe drop him into loose forward at times then I don’t see the point. Litten is maybe a little small but tbf he hasn’t been given much of a crack in the first team to judge his ability
Maybe its Litten that wants yo leave.
As a back up I think he is a good option, gives us the chance to see if he can cut it at the top level before Houghton retires.
I could see Houghton doing some game time at 13 next year.
As a back up I think he is a good option, gives us the chance to see if he can cut it at the top level before Houghton retires.
I could see Houghton doing some game time at 13 next year.
We need another established hooker, in one game when DH was injured Washy and Hadley played there and the distribution from dummy half was abismal. With the big money signings a low key player would probably be all we could hope for tbf