His Bobness wrote:
You are facing a Bradford like crisis and the only way out is an immediate and substantial downsizing.
Right now you are spending about 750k more per season on players than Rovers which is similar to your annual loss.
For your extra £750k you have 6 wins and 5th place in Super League compared to Rovers 6 wins and 6th place.. Who is getting value for money?
The 'glory or bust' experiment has failed.
Hull Fc need to act now or administration awaits.
Fair Point!
In the past decade:
- Rovers have been to Wembley once and lost narrowly by the odd fifty points in fifty
- Been in the Championship
- Been in the Play Offs 2/10
- Received a ‘gift’ of a £1m from the Allam’s
- Lost their Owner
- Held a Fun Day
Meanwhile
- Hull have been to Wembley three times, won twice (at a place some assured us that we’d never win)
- Only played in the Super League
- Been in the Play Offs 6/10 times
So who is getting value for money?