WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Proposed rule changes

Board index Super League Wakefield Trinity Proposed rule changes

Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:51 pm
Posted by wrencat1873 on Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:51 pm
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 1116
Rep Position: 2nd / 77,850

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 12173
NEtrinity wrote:
Agreed but I meant contested scrums take too much time setting up, collapsing etc. etc.


And, even in the days of "contested scrums", how many actually went against the head, although, I do miss the shout of FEEDING :D

The scrum is ok as it is now. It punctuates the play and gives the opportunity of a set piece move. Tyler Randal at Salford being a great example :D
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:23 pm
Posted by homme vaste on Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:23 pm
homme vaste User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 438
Rep Position: 45th / 77,850

Quiz Score: 184

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:11 pm
Posts: 1411
Location: Tomorrowland
I don`t think there are any rules within the game to stop teams contesting at a scrum? It`s just teams choose not to the majority of the time, i have seen us turn the ball over a number of times in the past few years when pushing at the scrum.
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:14 pm
Posted by JINJER on Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:14 pm
JINJER User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 136
Rep Position: 174th / 77,850

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:47 am
Posts: 7105
Location: WF6,a small town in Wakefield
wrencat1873 wrote:
And, even in the days of "contested scrums", how many actually went against the head, although, I do miss the shout of FEEDING :D

The scrum is ok as it is now. It punctuates the play and gives the opportunity of a set piece move. Tyler Randal at Salford being a great example :D

Come stand with us, I always throw a "feeding" in when stood with opposition supporters, always gets a reaction, every time.
Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:22 pm
Posted by Redscat on Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:22 pm
Redscat Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 229
Rep Position: 111th / 77,850

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:10 pm
Posts: 1394
Fordy wrote:
I remember a few years back our Boxing Day game against Leeds having to be called off and they rescheduled for New Years and made it a double header with Leeds RU.
We caught the back end of the Union game where nearly 10 minutes were taken up with one scrum, collapsing, being reset time and time again, only for it to eventually result in a penalty. Bored me to tears, so no thanks!!!


Surely it should be down to the referee to eliminate these tactics and to enforce the rules with sin-binning if necessary. I well remember the tussles between hookers and props in the contested scrums. They were a key element of the forward game,
and the hooker wasn't just another half-back. Nowadays, whats gonna be the next ruling re scrums eh: that the non-offending scrum half be allowed a free 20m run unopposed???
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:30 pm
Posted by Trinity1315 on Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:30 pm
Trinity1315 Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 139
Rep Position: 171st / 77,850

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:36 pm
Posts: 1122
wakefieldwall wrote:
What about offences close to line would you restart on the 10 or 20?


Wherever the scrum is set now.
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cheshirecat57, cocker, dboy, eastardsley, Eastern Wildcat, FickleFingerOfFate, financialtimes, Kettykat, Khlav Kalash, Lupsetbull, phe13, poplar cats alive, redandy, Redscat, ricardo07, STB, trin77, Trinity1964, wakeytrin, Willzay, Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo, Yosemite Sam and 163 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Wakefield Trinity


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,968,5111,54377,8504,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)





33