: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm  

I have added a comment but it is not showing up so i am presuming someone moderates them first.

: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:42 pm  

Wakefield No 1 wrote: ANOTHER ONE!! http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/feb/11/wakefield-wildcats-richard-moore-crohns-disease Stuart fielden??? This is just as bad, if not worse for three reasons: 1. The Guardian was originally a northern published newspaper (Manchester Guardian). 2. Very insensitive, considering the very delicate situation of Richard's health. 3. Is the writer not the same Gareth Walker who writes in the RLE? If it is, he ought to be ashamed at himself for writing such a lazy article in an insincere manner.

Wakefield No 1 wrote: ANOTHER ONE!! http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/feb/11/wakefield-wildcats-richard-moore-crohns-disease Stuart fielden??? This is just as bad, if not worse for three reasons: 1. The Guardian was originally a northern published newspaper (Manchester Guardian). 2. Very insensitive, considering the very delicate situation of Richard's health. 3. Is the writer not the same Gareth Walker who writes in the RLE? If it is, he ought to be ashamed at himself for writing such a lazy article in an insincere manner.

: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:49 pm  

Barry Clegg 2nd wrote:

I have added a comment but it is not showing up so i am presuming someone moderates them first.

I added one too, said it would be moderated first.

: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:52 pm  

Wakefieldite wrote:

This is just as bad, if not worse for three reasons:

1. The Guardian was originally a northern published newspaper (Manchester Guardian).
2. Very insensitive, considering the very delicate situation of Richard's health.
3. Is the writer not the same Gareth Walker who writes in the RLE? If it is, he ought to be ashamed at himself for writing such a lazy article in an insincere manner.

He probably didnt have anything to do with the picture, he just wrote the article.

: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:56 pm  

Wakefield No 1 wrote:

He probably didnt have anything to do with the picture, he just wrote the article.

Yes but surely on something official like that, there's gotta be proofers checking for such obvious and basic errors like that. If any of us did something like that in our jobs, we'd be out of work quicker than you can say dole queue.

: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:08 pm  

Wakefieldite wrote:

This is just as bad, if not worse for three reasons:

1. The Guardian was originally a northern published newspaper (Manchester Guardian).
2. Very insensitive, considering the very delicate situation of Richard's health.
3. Is the writer not the same Gareth Walker who writes in the RLE? If it is, he ought to be ashamed at himself for writing such a lazy article in an insincere manner.

eh? It is just a summary report that essentially gives the detail with very little reporting. Yes the photo is poor, but as pointed out, the author will almost certainly not have been responsible for that.

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:35 am  

Barry Clegg 2nd wrote:

I have added a comment but it is not showing up so i am presuming someone moderates them first.

Would not have thought anything you wrote would need moderating TBH

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:59 am  

It comes from all the years of abuse i received as a mod on the wakey site, it is like a disease, first the torture starts to send you mental which has this strange side effect which makes you sleep with your cousins, then you develop this arrogance in your posts, you don't mean to type but you just cant help it. Im just worried now as the specialist reckons that the next phase is wearing a blue and amber shirt, dribbling lots shouting weeds whilst everyone laughs at you.

: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:38 am  

the daily mail is a disgrace