Re: Leeds ratings : Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:30 pm  

The Whiffy Kipper wrote:

No it's not

If that's the case, are you saying a prop/middle can never win MOM, for example as they're automatically docked points for not doing the full 80?

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:42 am  

Phuzzy wrote:

If that's the case, are you saying a prop/middle can never win MOM, for example as they're automatically docked points for not doing the full 80?

Talk about being obsessed, Jesus, let it go, He's in a position that should be on the field for the full 80 barring injury, the other forwards are in positions that regularly get spelled, there is no comparison.

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:34 am  

I’m with phuzzy on this. Lockers has more influence on a game in 50 minutes than most 13s would ever have over 80. His time on the pitch isn’t relevant (particularly this season so far) because his contribution to the side is of such a high standard.

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:43 am  

Bigredwarrior wrote:

I’m with phuzzy on this. Lockers has more influence on a game in 50 minutes than most 13s would ever have over 80. His time on the pitch isn’t relevant (particularly this season so far) because his contribution to the side is of such a high standard.

It is relevant when he only plays 16 minutes, In half the games he played last season he played less than 30 minutes, It is also relevant when we have to use a subs place on the bench for his cover.

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:48 am  

The Whiffy Kipper wrote:

It is relevant when he only plays 16 minutes, In half the games he played last season he played less than 30 minutes, It is also relevant when we have to use a subs place on the bench for his cover.

Evidence?

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:02 pm  

The Whiffy Kipper wrote:

It is relevant when he only plays 16 minutes, In half the games he played last season he played less than 30 minutes, It is also relevant when we have to use a subs place on the bench for his cover.

Ah right, so not relevant for either of the opening games this season then which is in fact where this thread started?

Honestly Whiffy, if you really think Lockers was only a 5 against Leeds, there’s no point discussing it any further. Your opinion is just that and nobody else agrees with you. That’ll be my last comment on this topic.

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:16 pm  

The Whiffy Kipper wrote:

It is relevant when he only plays 16 minutes, In half the games he played last season he played less than 30 minutes, It is also relevant when we have to use a subs place on the bench for his cover.

That is utter trash and you know it.

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:43 pm  

Phuzzy wrote:

That is utter trash and you know it.

Prove it and I won't say anymore on the matter

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:11 pm  

Meanwhile, Sean O'Loughlin is awarded 2 points on the man of steel charts for his performance...
Sorry Kipper

Re: Leeds ratings : Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:25 pm  

JWarriors wrote:

Meanwhile, Sean O'Loughlin is awarded 2 points on the man of steel charts for his performance...
Sorry Kipper

Big Whoopedy Doo