WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - ZAK
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:01 pm  

Angelus wrote:
Angelus Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:10 pm
Posts: 310
Mash Butty wrote:
Can a moderator advise on what can and cannot be said on here please?


Not a mod but i generally like to go off the "Don't say anything you couldn't back up in court" rule.
Self-virtuous hypocrite
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:47 pm  
Rogues Gallery User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 12:07 pm
Posts: 31561
IF it's true
The club need to make a statement, but in reality can't do until he receives his charge sheet.

If it were me I'd fine him heavily, insist he moves over here immediately, at his own expense, any refusal would be immediate termination of contract.

OR they could sell him back to Cas for a transfer fee, now that would be good :lol:

I always stated that it was too big a risk but hey ho that's life, at the moment it has only cost Wigan about one months salary.
SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS

For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.

For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.

Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm  
nottinghamtiger Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 2761
Rogues Gallery wrote:
IF it's true
The club need to make a statement, but in reality can't do until he receives his charge sheet.

If it were me I'd fine him heavily, insist he moves over here immediately, at his own expense, any refusal would be immediate termination of contract.

OR they could sell him back to Cas for a transfer fee, now that would be good :lol:

I always stated that it was too big a risk but hey ho that's life, at the moment it has only cost Wigan about one months salary.


Don’t think he can be paid until his ban ends. He can train etc but can’t be employed. So he’ll have cost nothing but the expensive legal fees to get a shortened ban. Which another club will take advantage off if Wigan give him the boot.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:55 pm  

Grimmy wrote:
Grimmy Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:05 pm
Posts: 14347
Rogues Gallery wrote:
IF it's true
The club need to make a statement, but in reality can't do until he receives his charge sheet.

If it were me I'd fine him heavily, insist he moves over here immediately, at his own expense, any refusal would be immediate termination of contract.

OR they could sell him back to Cas for a transfer fee, now that would be good :lol:

I always stated that it was too big a risk but hey ho that's life, at the moment it has only cost Wigan about one months salary.

It's also cost us months where we could have been looking for a marquee full back or scrum half
Frank Zappa wrote:
Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.

The_Enforcer wrote:
Most idiotic post ever goes to Grimmy..... The way to restart should be an arm wrestle between a designated player from each side.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:22 pm  
nottinghamtiger Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 2761
Due in court on 11th October. Charged with driving with excess alcohol, driving whilst uninsured and driving without an MOT.

He’s also assisting police with their enquiries regarding a large quantity of class A found in the car.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:23 pm  

100% Warrior wrote:
100% Warrior Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 6339
Confirmed by Phil Wilkinson on Twitter. Also states the club have made a brief statement but will make no further comment until judicial process has been completed.

I honestly don’t know what we should do. I know we have Escare and I know he’s a good player but I just wonder if he’s good enough at FB defensively.

Do we say “now you’re in last chance saloon”? It’s not like we haven’t had players drink drive in the past is it (Gelling springs to mind). Then again we haven’t had a player with Zak’s chequered past drink drive. Or do we say “You had your chance, you blew it” (no pun intended).

I can’t make my mind up to be perfectly honest. If I was pushed I’d probably tip on the let him go side.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm  

100% Warrior wrote:
100% Warrior Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 6339
nottinghamtiger wrote:
Due in court on 11th October. Charged with driving with excess alcohol, driving whilst uninsured and driving without an MOT.

He’s also assisting police with their enquiries regarding a large quantity of class A found in the car.


I doubt that. If that was the case Zak would have been Released Under Investigation (RUI) and not charged with any offence and instead summonsed to court by a postal requisition for all offences laid. The Police don’t charge someone with some offences but not others still being investigated which are part of the same incident.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:27 pm  
nottinghamtiger Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 2761
100% Warrior wrote:

Do we say “now you’re in last chance saloon”?.


Zak spends his life in the last chance saloon. I thought he was already there when Wigan signed him. The trouble is that he’s always turning his life around. Fact is that he can’t.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:29 pm  
nottinghamtiger Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 2761
100% Warrior wrote:
I doubt that. If that was the case Zak would have been Released Under Investigation (RUI) and not charged with any offence and instead summonsed to court by a postal requisition for all offences laid. The Police don’t charge someone with some offences but not others still being investigated which are part of the same incident.


Doubt it all you want, but the statements confirm he is still assisting police. He wouldn’t be assisting them with offences he’s already been charged for, would he?
Unfortunately, as I’ve said throughout this thread, Zak is incapable of making the right choice. When most of us would walk away or say no, Zak just does it anyway.
He needs serious help.
Last edited by nottinghamtiger on Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: ZAK Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:31 pm  

User avatarMadDogg wrote:
MadDogg User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 7584
Location: The Mighty Wigan
An embarrassment to the sport and to himself.

Mistakes happen in life but when you make the amount of mistakes he has, suffer the consequences.for those mistakes and yet still continue to make them - theres not too much you can do.

Was willing to give him a chance but only the one. Go with Escare and sign the right halfback when he becomes available.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ColD, Cruncher, Egg Chasing, exiled Warrior, Father Ted, FearTheVee, Google [Bot], Grimmy, hatty, Jukesays, KingRoss11, Lazy J, LondonRobster, MadDogg, MattyB, NickyKiss, RedWarrior32, secondstanza, Suzy Banyon, The Whiffy Kipper, The Yellow Giraffe, Tricky Dicky, warriorweed, wiganermike and 204 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to Wigan Warriors


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDTEAM
5,103,3711,35978,3554,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and fixtures and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
Please Support RLFANS.COM


YOU HAVE RL FIXTURES OFF
RLFANS Recent Posts




X