: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:06 am  

maurice wrote:

Lee Marsh for me (if fit) on a tight pitch it will be physical

He can't tackle Mo

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:22 am  

After watching Marsh at the reserves, i wouldnt want him playing 6. He cant pass at all. I would use him in the 2nd row, if we were to play him. I would put Durbin at 6.

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:24 am  

ColD wrote:

He can't tackle Mo

Which of our prospective 6's can?

At least he's bigger than the rest and would take the opposition longer to run around him

tom hemmingway : Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:02 am  

We have got to play the player who will be most effective at stand off imo. For me it would be Marsh and if he has a good game I,ll forgive him his last first team appearance.

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:07 pm  

FredParky wrote:

Which of our prospective 6's can?

At least he's bigger than the rest and would take the opposition longer to run around him

Not bad Fred, Not bad at all

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:29 pm  

not sure about having Armitstead and Marsh playing together - hardly speed merchants are they?!

I would probably put Durbin at standoff and Marsh on the bench as he is a (relatively) versatile player..

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:27 pm  

Durbin at 6 for me.

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:05 pm  

playing for giants v saints this weekend.
will see how good is then....

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:33 pm  

bit annoying that we lose such a key player just so that Huddersfield can field a weakened team - if they are seriously not arsed about losing why not just put the under 18s out?

: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:40 pm  

kirkhall wrote:

I was rather hoping he'd been pushed!

His kicking game alone second half against Toulouse was brilliant. He's taken so much pressure off Watson... we needed him for the Gateshead game at least.