Board index ‹ Welcome to RLFANS ‹ The Virtual Terrace ‹ ELSTONE

atomic wrote:

You have managed quite well without it.

I don't get that......

Egg Chasing wrote:

So could every club. I doubt there are any RL clubs that can survive without money from their owner.

Yeah thats true without Lenagan you'd just be a memory
https://www.wigantoday.net/sport/rugby- ... ar-3061206

atomic wrote:

He did well keeping your club in limelight..

Are you high?

snowie wrote:

Yeah thats true without Lenagan you'd just be a memory
https://www.wigantoday.net/sport/rugby- ... ar-3061206

Do us a favour if you will, just tell me how much wakefirldnhavemlost over the samentenure as leneghan (its about 5million or so for leneghan).

I tried to look for myself, got a bit confused though with the various different companies,filings and confusing statements from aruous administrators etc.

atomic wrote:

You have managed quite well without it.

No idea what this means

Jukesays wrote:

Do us a favour if you will, just tell me how much wakefirldnhavemlost over the samentenure as leneghan (its about 5million or so for leneghan).

I tried to look for myself, got a bit confused though with the various different companies,filings and confusing statements from aruous administrators etc.

were not talking about Wakefield's past I replied to EC who puts the blame on lower clubs voting to have self interest as he wants the rich clubs to have the ability to spend as much as it wants but clearly you think £885,000 loss is acceptable to maintain and this is while your club is highly in the league

Jukesays wrote:

Do us a favour if you will, just tell me how much wakefirldnhavemlost over the samentenure as leneghan (its about 5million or so for leneghan).

I tried to look for myself, got a bit confused though with the various different companies,filings and confusing statements from aruous administrators etc.

Wakefield don't have a rich backer. Their accounts suggest they have pretty much broken even (lost maybe on average £30k a year) over the period since Carter has been in charge, plus bought Belle Vue.

I see Pearson has come out at Hull saying the appointment and split was a mistake, if only they had listened to Dewsbury,Batley,York,Featherstone,Bradford owners at the time who said this is exactly what would of happened.

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/ ... -big-vote/

bulls2487 wrote:

I see Pearson has come out at Hull saying the appointment and split was a mistake, if only they had listened to Dewsbury,Batley,York,Featherstone,Bradford owners at the time who said this is exactly what would of happened.

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/ ... -big-vote/

You'll be telling us next that it was the self interest of the top 4/5 SL clubs that got him the gig, The fans of whom, blame the "small" clubs for holding the game back

There is one thing for sure, RL faces some serious challenges in the short, medium and long term and as a sport, we desperately need to be making some good, positive choices.
There will always be self interest form the big clubs steering the game but, there needs to be some long term vision and a leader who can help implement and changes that are required.