Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:19 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

What forward pass? If you mean the one Alex Sutcliffe threw that Myler picked up and scored from then it did go backwards first...that it took a bounce forward after it hit the ground is irrelevant, it went backwards first so play on.

Ball went forward, the bounce was three or four yards ahead of where he passed it from. Never been one to say if we would've won or lost from a decision like that but it was forward.

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:20 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

What forward pass? If you mean the one Alex Sutcliffe threw that Myler picked up and scored from then it did go backwards first...that it took a bounce forward after it hit the ground is irrelevant, it went backwards first so play on.

Do you really believe it wasn't a forward pass?

At least that play was like watching the Leeds of old.

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:26 pm  

The Devil's Advocate wrote:

Do you really believe it wasn't a forward pass?.

Yes, take the desperate for Leeds to lose specs off. Went backwards originally, that it bounced forwards after hitting the ground is irrelevant if you learn the rules:

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:27 pm  

Traffic wrote:

Ball went forward, the bounce was three or four yards ahead of where he passed it from. Never been one to say if we would've won or lost from a decision like that but it was forward.

No it want learn the rules

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:38 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Yes, take the desperate for Leeds to lose specs off. Went backwards originally, that it bounced forwards after hitting the ground is irrelevant if you learn the rules:

It has nothing to do with me desperately wanting Leeds to lose, I couldn't give a monkeys, it's more to do with your blue & amber specs, it didn't go backwards at any time.

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 7:50 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

No it want learn the rules

You claimed the bounce took it forward when it's plain to see the pass was thrown on the 15 metre mark and it landed just before the 10 metre mark and the bounce highlighted it. And if you can't come up with anything other than learn the rules then don't bother replying.

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 8:00 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Yes, take the desperate for Leeds to lose specs off. Went backwards originally, that it bounced forwards after hitting the ground is irrelevant if you learn the rules:

Oh come on. It went forward and then bounced even further forwards. I think you know that

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 8:00 pm  

how embarrassing seeing that forward pass being allowed, its not as clear cut though as the stains try that was given what was double movement

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 8:14 pm  

Traffic wrote:

You claimed the bounce took it forward when it's plain to see the pass was thrown on the 15 metre mark and it landed just before the 10 metre mark and the bounce highlighted it. And if you can't come up with anything other than learn the rules then don't bother replying.

I'll come up learn the rules when you actually bother to learn them. I don't necessarily agree with the momentum rule but it clearly comes out of his hands backwards and Alex Sutcliffe ends up ahead of the ball where it lands. It's a try any day of the week under the current rules we go by week in week out.....if the rules are changed then fair enough, but until that day don't say something isn't a try when it clearly is under current rules.

Re: GAME ON : Leeds Rhinos v London Broncos - 15:30:00 : Sun May 26, 2019 8:25 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

I'll come up learn the rules when you actually bother to learn them. I don't necessarily agree with the momentum rule but it clearly comes out of his hands backwards and Alex Sutcliffe ends up ahead of the ball where it lands. It's a try any day of the week under the current rules we go by week in week out.....if the rules are changed then fair enough, but until that day don't say something isn't a try when it clearly is under current rules.

Well we"ll have to agree to differ given I don't think it did and given your patronising response best to leave it there.