Re: Hull KR 10 Salford 28 : Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:38 am  

moxi1 wrote:

Copy of my own post from HKR board.

Totally out enthused, and that’s totally unacceptable.

The qualifiers concept is a joke. I was happy Widnes got beat last night because they’re the team that should go down with them finishing bottom. Whilst we have never finished bottom we once again find ourselves scrappyimg to survive. I kinda hope we and Leeds go down together because that’s 20k fans lost to the top flight.

Beaten again by the club with the paper thin squad, no money, crowdfunding to make money and no fans when it really matters. They finish below us, but we look like we could go down... again.

The system rewards clubs that don’t aspire to be anything more than clubs that make up the numbers.

Only in Rugby League.

This coming from a fan of a club who left money aside on the salary cap specifically so they could recruit FOR the middle 8's resulting in not being competitive enough in the first 23 rounds. How's that for aspiration and making up the numbers?

Re: Hull KR 10 Salford 28 : Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:06 am  

Channel Islander wrote:

This coming from a fan of a club who left money aside on the salary cap specifically so they could recruit FOR the middle 8's resulting in not being competitive enough in the first 23 rounds. How's that for aspiration and making up the numbers?

Totally disagree with that. Do some research on all the work my clubs done when compared with most clubs in the league before trying to slate it.

Holding money back? We sign Todd Carney for a month on maybe 10k for that month along with crookes and Hall who’ll be on 10k for the month combined? Held loads of money back there. I’m sure every club in the league could have signed somone for a month.