Re: Leeds : Wed May 11, 2016 6:05 pm  

Heh I'd love that to be the final league positions

Re: Leeds : Wed May 11, 2016 6:52 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Heh I'd love that to be the final league positions

That'd be funny. Not sure it's possible at this point though. Widnes might be able to fall that far but I don't think Wigan can.

Hmmm. I will figure out how to look into that.

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 6:32 am  

My feeling about the current position Leeds are in, is exactly the same as the fans of Leeds and any other club would be, if we, Wigan were in the same position...

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 6:47 am  

vbfg wrote:

"Form" over the last five games. The order of the teams is the same order the table would be in right now if the season started five games ago (and there'd been no points deductions).

I thought that all the red circles for Widnes related to Denis Betts' rising blood pressure.
He seemed to need to let off a bit of steam after their last league game

It does make interesting reading though and it makes Salford's exit from the cup even more of a surprise

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 7:48 am  

Wigan Peer wrote:

My feeling about the current position Leeds are in, is exactly the same as the fans of Leeds and any other club would be, if we, Wigan were in the same position...

Can't argue with that really.

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 1:49 pm  

not that we have been at Wigan for a few years though

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 3:23 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

I thought that all the red circles for Widnes related to Denis Betts' rising blood pressure.
He seemed to need to let off a bit of steam after their last league game

It does make interesting reading though and it makes Salford's exit from the cup even more of a surprise

More like your own blood pressure when it comes to Betts and his 1 and only ever outburst about a referee which as seeing as Cobb has been stood down for the past 2 weeks seems to have been proven correct that it was a truly shocking refereeing performance that cost Widnes the 2 points.
Think Wakefield should get their own house in order before you come on here spouting off about other clubs and their coaches and players.

Kind Regards

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 5:22 pm  

Brenio wrote:

More like your own blood pressure when it comes to Betts and his 1 and only ever outburst about a referee which as seeing as Cobb has been stood down for the past 2 weeks seems to have been proven correct that it was a truly shocking refereeing performance that cost Widnes the 2 points.
Think Wakefield should get their own house in order before you come on here spouting off about other clubs and their coaches and players.

Kind Regards

Ftr Cobb wasn't reffing the week after because he was involved with the anniversary of Chernobyl, but hey don't let that get in the way of your theory.

As for Wakefield's house, do tell.

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 5:30 pm  

LeedsDave wrote:

Can't argue with that really.

Nice to see someone with a sense of humour....

I would say that all RL fans will be very shocked to see where Leeds are currently. Last years retirees would have affected things around the club, big name, big game players leaving can make a massive difference... Look back to when Andy Farrell left us, you lose more that the player, you lose the effect they have on others, and Andy Farrell often dragged us to wins we should not have got... i said before the season started that it would be interesting to see what happened at Leeds this season, i'm sure nobody would have predicted the present situation.... Onward and upwards...

Re: Leeds : Thu May 12, 2016 5:46 pm  

Shifty Cat wrote:

:BOOHOO:

Ftr Cobb wasn't reffing the week after because he was involved with the anniversary of Chernobyl, but hey don't let that get in the way of your theory.

As for Wakefield's house, do tell.

yes you are right only problem is the anniversary of chernobyl was 2 weeks before so he would have been there when no one else was but as allways with cobb he never gets anything right