Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:37 pm  

Molsk111 wrote:

Jk said Dane was a couple of weeks away, you believe what ever you like, I believe it’s lie after lie, who signed Jon margin, because they obviously didn’t do there homework on him, too many questions to ask, but no point as you never get the truth back, no one from the club makes comments, read what Dane has said, your not blind the truth is in there or can’t you read

You are right the truth is there DC says JK does not want Dane Chisholm. End of story. The club won`t reveal reasons, maybe because no other club would touch him with a bargepole if they did.

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 5:41 pm  

And we got rid of the lad to Huddersfield because ????
And we shipped Magrin out because ????
Next we will be signing that Scottish half back scotch mist

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:04 pm  

Molsk111 wrote:

And we got rid of the lad to Huddersfield because ????
And we shipped Magrin out because ????
Next we will be signing that Scottish half back scotch mist

What point are you trying to make here. You appear to mistrust the motives of our owners but is there a conspiracy theory you want so share?

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:04 pm  

Molsk111 wrote:

And we got rid of the lad to Huddersfield because ????
And we shipped Magrin out because ????
Next we will be signing that Scottish half back scotch mist

What about Oscar Thomas?

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:11 pm  

Molsk111 wrote:

And we got rid of the lad to Huddersfield because ????
And we shipped Magrin out because ????
Next we will be signing that Scottish half back scotch mist

Wilson probably be because we got offered £100k and it's too big an offer to turn down (he may have said hed leave at the end of his contract for nothing)

Margrin, I mean he's gone to London Skolars. I don't see the big conspiracy theory in that story.

Fans don't need to be told every detail. If clubs told us of every spat and fall out coaches and players have no one would sign for us. Clubs always keep stuff in house.

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:14 pm  

Also reading his partners Facebook comments it looks like it's zero to do with financial reasons. For whatever reason it looks like Chisholm wasn't in Kears plans for the year.

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:18 pm  

If some rumours are true it seems Danes already been offered to at least Newcastle, Hunslet and Fev. Issue I have is that we are now very short at half and hooker and have 3 games in 9 days. We are one injury away from a crisis which could derail a season. Was the relationship that bad or we have got a replacement lined up? The Flanagan injury you would think would have made his release less likely short term

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:28 pm  

Finally I’m hearing some good news
Someone coming in, but guess who

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:47 pm  

Molsk111 wrote:

Finally I’m hearing some good news
Someone coming in, but guess who

Can you categorically confirm it isn't Bill and Ben Flowerpot?

Re: Dane Chisholm : Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:53 pm  

Sorry but chisholms biggest fan is chisholm. There wasn't exactly a big queue for his services before us.

Out of the two - chisholm and kears judgement I'll take kear all day long. Done a lot, proved a lot.

Chisholm done bugger all for me. Big fish in tiny pond syndrome