Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Mon May 21, 2012 3:29 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Is it George Galloway? It sounds similar!

Him as well? Good god I'm well shut of her.

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Mon May 21, 2012 3:33 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

So you know it's definitely not Simon Fox?

Proof?

Put all the half truths together and in the middle you will see a hole. That hole is exactly the same size and shape as the lie you are being told.

Whether his name is Simon or Fantastic Mr isn't the story. The story is more about who told you and why?

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Mon May 21, 2012 3:42 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

So you know it's definitely not Simon Fox?

Proof?

Mick, you're embarrassing yourself again.

MB may not "definitely know" or otherwise whom I may be, but I do. And, apologies for bursting yet another of your bubbles, but I am not the aforementioned. You do seem to be a little obsessed may I point out. Perhaps you should focus more on the points I was making about the current predicament and the logical standpoint of maintaining a positive nature regarding the review and not on your attempts at grandstanding on behalf of others.

I am alternatively, any one of: George Galloway, Keith Senior, Richie Spedding, Chris Caisley, Red Rum, Jimmy Hoffa, Peter Hood, JFK, Stuart Duffy, Hulk Hogan and Lord Lucan.

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Mon May 21, 2012 4:07 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

Mick, you're embarrassing yourself again.

MB may not "definitely know" or otherwise whom I may be, but I do. And, apologies for bursting yet another of your bubbles, but I am not the aforementioned. You do seem to be a little obsessed may I point out. Perhaps you should focus more on the points I was making about the current predicament and the logical standpoint of maintaining a positive nature regarding the review and not on your attempts at grandstanding on behalf of others.

I am alternatively, any one of: George Galloway, Keith Senior, Richie Spedding, Chris Caisley, Red Rum, Jimmy Hoffa, Peter Hood, JFK, Stuart Duffy, Hulk Hogan and Lord Lucan.

I'm hardly embarrassing myself Simon, when one has such an axe to grind against Bradford Bulls Rugby League Football Club.

However you at least talk constructive sense and I won't question you're knowledge, when presented with our current plight.

As I posted on Twitter yesterday, Chris Caisley is still very much actively sourcing investment for the short and longer term future of the club.

Someone on an financial sounding with the club has told me that Chris Caisley has approached said individual for an £150,000 investment, in return for sponsorship.

So I'm convinced that attempts have been made to avoid administration.

However that doesn't mean we will miraculously avoid it.

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Mon May 21, 2012 4:22 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

I'm hardly embarrassing myself Simon, when one has such an axe to grind against Bradford Bulls Rugby League Football Club.

However you at least talk constructive sense and I won't question you're knowledge, when presented with our current plight.

As I posted on Twitter yesterday, Chris Caisley is still very much actively sourcing investment for the short and longer term future of the club.

Someone on an financial sounding with the club has told me that Chris Caisley has approached said individual for an £150,000 investment, in return for sponsorship.

So I'm convinced that attempts have been made to avoid administration.

However that doesn't mean we will miraculously avoid it.

I will ignore your ongoing (and incorrect) obsession with whom I may be as comical as it is, but by all means refer to me as whomever you wish if it continues your obsession and whatever inaccuracy somebody is feeding you to relay. Weeks ago you were also categorical in your assumption I was Caisley himself. I applaud your ability to blow with the latest wind

I don't read your Twitter feed (I'd be unsure of the reality of any names for a start) however I would fully expect the current review team and CC himself to be holding multiple conversations with both personal and commercial investors. That being in return for some form of sponsorship would have complete validity.

At no point have I believed that the current review team are actively looking to place it in administration, or indeed, have that as their de facto outcome. To hold that standpoint is both incredibly negative, lacking objectivity and doing nothing to aid the current predicament. That has been my constant all along to the chagrin of a couple of folks who are determined they are personally privy to the obviously pre-ordained outcome.

Yes, the silence is deafening from the review, but then I would expect nothing less and realistically, I'm more than happy to await the final assessment.

[Bulliac]

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Tue May 22, 2012 10:13 am  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

Mick, you're embarrassing yourself again.

MB may not "definitely know" or otherwise whom I may be, but I do. And, apologies for bursting yet another of your bubbles, but I am not the aforementioned. You do seem to be a little obsessed may I point out. Perhaps you should focus more on the points I was making about the current predicament and the logical standpoint of maintaining a positive nature regarding the review and not on your attempts at grandstanding on behalf of others.

I am alternatively, any one of: George Galloway, Keith Senior, Richie Spedding, Chris Caisley, Red Rum, Jimmy Hoffa, Peter Hood, JFK, Stuart Duffy, Hulk Hogan and Lord Lucan.

Given your stated location, of "here there and everywhere" you missed out the most obvious one: Dr Who...

Though quantum theory suggests that that location applies to us all!!

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Tue May 22, 2012 6:46 pm  

Comedy Gold!

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Wed May 23, 2012 7:18 am  

Wait until the review is complete but in the meantime Whitehead & Bateman start talks with Warrington. I wonder what the review will conclude.

[Bulliac]

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Wed May 23, 2012 8:03 am  

tigertot wrote:

Wait until the review is complete but in the meantime Whitehead & Bateman start talks with Warrington. I wonder what the review will conclude.

Surely they're talking to lots of clubs? You're not going to get the best deal just talking to the one......?

Re: Bulls finances 'considerably worse than originally thoug : Wed May 23, 2012 8:26 am  

tigertot wrote:

Wait until the review is complete but in the meantime Whitehead & Bateman start talks with Warrington. I wonder what the review will conclude.

Does anybody have an idea when the club will be announcing the findings from the review getting very bored of waiting