Listened to the clips, thanks.
With what seams to be 2 warring parties, ie Hood Caisley. It's very hard to tell anything from the exchange about investors.
Both parties will know that this meeting was there to get their point across. Was the man talking about investors genuine? Or was he there to spread suspicion that CC has sown this up.
Where the people shouting him down independent or stooges of Caisley there to cover any talk of other interested parties.
It's a very messy thing indeed. The more and more I read and hear about this it seams that Bradford has been torn apart by it's own Shareholders and may still be continuing to do so.
The administrator well who knows, he says there is no interest, but then he says he has text's that he is chasing down, but he does not have voice mail????? If you were questioning the guy in court then that slight change in story would be pounced upon as not a reliable witness.
However it could just be that he was under pressure and he meant to say, there has been interest, but no solid offers. He also said people wanted up to date figures but he did not have them, because they had just changed the figures. Well he could still give the figures as were surely and pass on any changes.
As an outsider I don't know what to make of it, if your a bradford fan I suppose it depends which side of the war you are on as to what you take from it. If you take no side then I guess your just very very disallusioned
