Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:53 pm  

Didn,t Kershaw also apologise afterwards saying he had made a mistake as video ref? Seem to get a few of those after the event when it's far too late

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:53 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

No deletes

There has to be some deletes, otherwise it looks like 1 poster is having a conversation with himself

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:58 pm  

Some of the longest threads in this forum's history happened with one person talking amongst themselves.

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:24 pm  

debaser wrote:

I have just re-read that article, we really were shafted by the ref. How was it not a penalty?

And Withers' non-knock on. It's all coming flooding back. The RFL have always hated us.

Let's not forget Jordan Tansey at Cardiff, that still makes me throw the remote at the tele

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:29 pm  

I met this gangster who pulls up the back of people's pants, it was Wedgie Kray.

A three-legged dog walks into a saloon in the Old West. He slides up to the bar and announces: 'I'm looking for the man who shot my paw.'

I've got a friend who's fallen in love with two school bags, he's bisatchel.

I was having dinner with Garry Kasparov and there was a check tablecloth. It took him two hours to pass me the salt.

I cleaned the attic with the wife the other day. Now I can't get the cobwebs out of her hair.

I met a Dutch girl with inflatable shoes last week, phoned her up to arrange a date but unfortunately she'd popped her clogs.

My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance. We'll see about that.

I said to the Gym instructor "Can you teach me to do the splits?" He said, "How flexible are you?" I said, "I can't make Tuesdays"

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:17 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I met this gangster who pulls up the back of people's pants, it was Wedgie Kray.

A three-legged dog walks into a saloon in the Old West. He slides up to the bar and announces: 'I'm looking for the man who shot my paw.'

I've got a friend who's fallen in love with two school bags, he's bisatchel.

I was having dinner with Garry Kasparov and there was a check tablecloth. It took him two hours to pass me the salt.

I cleaned the attic with the wife the other day. Now I can't get the cobwebs out of her hair.

I met a Dutch girl with inflatable shoes last week, phoned her up to arrange a date but unfortunately she'd popped her clogs.

My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance. We'll see about that."

I said to the Gym instructor "Can you teach me to do the splits?" He said, "How flexible are you?" I said, "I can't make Tuesdays"

badoom tssssh

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:54 pm  

Nothus wrote:

Well at least it didn't derail into a discussion about the commentary this time!

phew dont tempt me!

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:42 pm  

debaser wrote:

I have just re-read that article, we really were shafted by the ref. How was it not a penalty?

And Withers' non-knock on. It's all coming flooding back. The RFL have always hated us.

I prefer to remember his hat trick and that first half of perfect rugby league. Not to mention Scots first tackle that dismembered Renouf for the rest of the game. Proactive defence of the highest order. The beauty was that a friend recorded the game on yes video tape and I watched it three times through sunday morning.

Leon has got over it and it was his (18th?) birthday, so thats life.

to add to FA's insufficient answer: I made several posts, triggered by several different posters all rather late at night. The only poster up at that time to answer my post, and it was in this specific case that they were a troll on their own fansite, (and the only sensible answer to that accusation was not to answer), was of course your very own FA. QED, he cannot help himself.

Eddie, dont get carried away, I supported you in your accusations about FA, nothing more.

VBFG ( RAB International heavyweight statistician of the World) what is the data, who has posted the most column inches in the last two years, who has posted the longest single post (exclude my attempt to get FA to make a single post that was a whole page long, I think you would call it cleansing the data). Dummit, I have just realised... all you guys are not FA sycophants, you too have been pressing the FA buttons and getting the same mechanical response. Oooh you bitches!

Change of advice Dr Feelgood. Have yourself a good laugh (and earn some money - but not much) by running a sweepstake on the extent of FAs over-response to the controversial question, what is the first letter of the alphabet?

so there we are. Four posts in one, to different people, who may choose to answer them or not, rather similar to last night.

Except tonight, FA, you have two options, the instinctive response of last night, or commonsense.

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:29 am  

VBFG ( RAB International heavyweight statistician of the World) what is the data, who has posted the most column inches in the last two years, who has posted the longest single post (exclude my attempt to get FA to make a single post that was a whole page long, I think you would call it cleansing the data).

Give me a week.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Bull/batley thread boring : Wed Jun 22, 2016 11:40 am  

martinwildbull wrote:

SNIP...

Well the moderators are disappointed at your late night explosion. Here's a few of your quotes.

martinwildbull wrote:

if you are not in the FA clique you have to put up with the quantity and quality of his stream of Bullshit aimed at anyone in his sights. It really does get a bit wearing. And of course not challenged by his Bulmchums the moderators.

martinwildbull wrote:

FA indiscriminately arguing with anybody in sight, and that casts a shadow across the forum that the "light touch" moderators refuse to lift.

martinwildbull wrote:

and the reason they are his Bumllchums? because the quantity and NATURE of his posts are so bloody wearing that if you cannot moderate him, join him.

Now which way are we supposed to play it? We either stay "Light-touch" which you appear to be dismissive of, or we get a bit firmer in which case you probably said enough to get banned. I don't know what friendless and jobless computer nerds mod the other forums but we've got jobs and families that make light-touch the preferable option. I would hope anyone who has ever sent us a PM would attest that we are very friendly and approachable which is probably a better option than getting so wound up you go nuts in public.

Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Vote remain.