Interesting that the article opens with "This magnificent match was marred by a sustained display of petulance by Bradford's veteran hooker James Lowes, who was still abusing the officials five minutes after the final hooter" which doesn't sound like the mellow James Lowes I know and love.
I know that I'm probably asking this too soon, whilst emotions are raw, but does anyone else think we should have had a penalty?
I've been thinking about the 2002 grand final and I have a lingering suspicion that Chris Joynt was guilty of a Voluntary tackle.
Interesting that the article opens with "This magnificent match was marred by a sustained display of petulance by Bradford's veteran hooker James Lowes, who was still abusing the officials five minutes after the final hooter" which doesn't sound like the mellow James Lowes I know and love.
I know that I'm probably asking this too soon, whilst emotions are raw, but does anyone else think we should have had a penalty?
Interesting that the article opens with "This magnificent match was marred by a sustained display of petulance by Bradford's veteran hooker James Lowes, who was still abusing the officials five minutes after the final hooter" which doesn't sound like the mellow James Lowes I know and love.
I know that I'm probably asking this too soon, whilst emotions are raw, but does anyone else think we should have had a penalty?
I have just re-read that article, we really were shafted by the ref. How was it not a penalty?
And Withers' non-knock on. It's all coming flooding back. The RFL have always hated us.
Pumpetypump wrote:
I've been thinking about the 2002 grand final and I have a lingering suspicion that Chris Joynt was guilty of a Voluntary tackle.
Interesting that the article opens with "This magnificent match was marred by a sustained display of petulance by Bradford's veteran hooker James Lowes, who was still abusing the officials five minutes after the final hooter" which doesn't sound like the mellow James Lowes I know and love.
I know that I'm probably asking this too soon, whilst emotions are raw, but does anyone else think we should have had a penalty?
I have just re-read that article, we really were shafted by the ref. How was it not a penalty?
And Withers' non-knock on. It's all coming flooding back. The RFL have always hated us.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Peter Goddard and 94 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...