Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 9:36 am  

What does peter smith in the YEP know about the game, always getting his captions wrong and now he's got singleton as a 7 with Ava and Donaldson on a 6?

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:00 am  

Seth wrote:

What does peter smith in the YEP know about the game, always getting his captions wrong and now he's got singleton as a 7 with Ava and Donaldson on a 6?

Singleton was a 3 or 4 in my eyes at best

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:05 am  

Seth wrote:

What does peter smith in the YEP know about the game, always getting his captions wrong and now he's got singleton as a 7 with Ava and Donaldson on a 6?

Those ratings all round are ridiculous. Clearly never watched the match.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

You cant go off stats unless you know which tackles are missed. If they are 1 on 1s fair enough but how do we know the ones missed arent from running 15 yards to cover someone else's missed tackle and never really having a chance to make the tackle but almost getting there. It still goes down as a missed tackle on your stats despite it actually being a great piece of effort.

A missed tackle is only classed when falling off a tackle. That is fact. This has been mentioned before about leaving gaps and not recorded.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:19 am  

Gotcha wrote:

A missed tackle is only classed when falling off a tackle. That is fact. This has been mentioned before about leaving gaps and not recorded.

Not talking about leaving gaps I'm talking about covering 15 yards diving full length getting hands on the player but not completing. That's a great effort but still a missed tackle.

There are missed tackles and missed tackles but they all go down as 1 on the sheet which is why unless you know which tackles are missed you cant go off the stats sheet to judge.

Trust your eyes and judgement. You said yesterday you thought Sutty did ok (no more no less) and I think you was absolutly correct. In typical Liam Sutcliffe style he just does enough to get by. Hes not as bad as people make out, he has ability but gives the impression he cant really be bothered and does what he needs to do to get picked next game. The lad needs a rocket up his backside.in truth.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:31 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

Not talking about leaving gaps I'm talking about covering 15 yards diving full length getting hands on the player but not completing. That's a great effort but still a missed tackle.

There are missed tackles and missed tackles but they all go down as 1 on the sheet which is why unless you know which tackles are missed you cant go off the stats sheet to judge.

Trust your eyes and judgement. You said yesterday you thought Sutty did ok (no more no less) and I think you was absolutly correct. In typical Liam Sutcliffe style he just does enough to get by. Hes not as bad as people make out, he has ability but gives the impression he cant really be bothered and does what he needs to do to get picked next game. The lad needs a rocket up his backside.in truth.

So how many of those type of tackles happened yesterday? I am going to suggest zero, so a bit of a mute point.

Sutcliffe doesn’t have ability, not agreeing with that, certainly not ability to play stand off for a super league side. But Gaskell gets away with it. He is very much a common denominator in the regression of Leeds as a club.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:40 am  

Gotcha wrote:

So how many of those type of tackles happened yesterday? I am going to suggest zero, so a bit of a mute point.

Sutcliffe doesn’t have ability, not agreeing with that, certainly not ability to play stand off for a super league side. But Gaskell gets away with it. He is very much a common denominator in the regression of Leeds as a club.

Do you know the 4 he missed? I suspect not. I know I don't so how can he be criticised for them on the back of a stats sheet? Crazy. You csnt judge a performance and then change an opinion from looking at a spreadsheet.

He does have ability its nonsense to say he doesn't. He scored a nice try yesterday.. Does he apply that ability often enough? Certainly not. Is he good enough to play stand off for Leeds long term? Certainly not but hes not talentless and to say he has no ability isn't fair.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:49 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

Do you know the 4 he missed? I suspect not. I know I don't so how can he be criticised for them on the back of a stats sheet? Crazy. You csnt judge a performance and then change an opinion from looking at a spreadsheet.

He does have ability its nonsense to say he doesn't. He scored a nice try yesterday.. Does he apply that ability often enough? Certainly not. Is he good enough to play stand off for Leeds long term? Certainly not but hes not talentless and to say he has no ability isn't fair.

I disagree with you Marty, and the facts speak for themselves to back that up. On the missed, no I don’t, and coukdn’t say The six for Watkins either, but guess if I watched the match again they would be easy to pick up, and won’t be down to making all out effort to cover 15 yards that you proposed, unless you can pin point an example?But I am not gluten for punishment to watch again, and prefer to look ahead.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 10:58 am  

Your turning into statto from fantasy football Gotcha I've told you before.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield : Mon May 27, 2019 11:02 am  

Gotcha wrote:

But I am not gluten for punishment to watch again, and prefer to look ahead.

Go on, it may give you a rye smile.