Re: Old board / new board : Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:55 pm  

So having done a bit of speculating and having asked questions about our financial situation on here apart from finding out that GFB isn’t Croady is anybody the wiser to what the situation actually is because I’m sure we’d all love to know the finer details.

Only the financial part that is.

Re: Old board / new board : Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:30 am  

Just out of interest it was announced not long after our success at Wembley that steve lambert was stepping down from the board to take up a non executive role , how come this wasn’t perceived as a pre - cursor to the imminent demise of the club , I mean he’s had more time and impact at the club than durgan but nothing was said

Re: Old board / new board : Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:55 pm  

Listenup94 wrote:

Just out of interest it was announced not long after our success at Wembley that steve lambert was stepping down from the board to take up a non executive role , how come this wasn’t perceived as a pre - cursor to the imminent demise of the club , I mean he’s had more time and impact at the club than durgan but nothing was said

It’s because the board had just sold their suits which kept us afloat for a couple of months.

Re: Old board / new board : Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:06 pm  

Listenup94 wrote:

Just out of interest it was announced not long after our success at Wembley that steve lambert was stepping down from the board to take up a non executive role , how come this wasn’t perceived as a pre - cursor to the imminent demise of the club , I mean he’s had more time and impact at the club than durgan but nothing was said

Might have had something to do with Durgs being in charge of a financial advisors/wealth management company. Not a good look to be involved with another struggling business, and maybe even puts that at risk? My understanding is that Steve always planned to step down at some point and it seemed a natural point to do it, not just a bolt out of the blue

Re: Old board / new board : Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:23 pm  

Inoffski1 wrote:

Might have had something to do with Durgs being in charge of a financial advisors/wealth management company. Not a good look to be involved with another struggling business, and maybe even puts that at risk? My understanding is that Steve always planned to step down at some point and it seemed a natural point to do it, not just a bolt out of the blue

Nah, it’s definitely the suits, Durgs only got his jacket back and didn’t want to be seen with no trousers on.