Assuming this is about the 14club expansion- after talking after the game last night, Bradford are fairly confident of getting in as the 12th IMG club, on merit, under the current system. Which would mean it is 2 out of Salford, Toulouse, York, London being “parachuted “ in. Is your stance purely anti-Bradford or does it cover York & London also?

Merit? What have bradford done that warrants the term merit ?


Appointed a shareholder of the Bradford bulls as chairman of the rfl who as sold and repurchased the hole that is odsal under dubious circumstances.


Also why am I having to pay a tenner to watch a game of rugby and listen to that dick headhill gledhill spouting is utter nonsense, it's not the bradford show.

It's sad when some fans can't see past own hatred of a Club

If the Bulls get the 12th spot under IMG we have got in on merit as matched the criteria which any other club has the option to do.


If we aren't in the top 12 we will be in the Top 14 under IMG so should we be excluded again because its the Bulls?


I feel the RFL/Wood are using the 13/14 decision to parachute London in who will drop down on IMG, Hetherington hasn't gone to London for nothing.


Without the Bulls paying and setting up the equipment to show the game you wouldn't have had chance to watch it all.  I wonder if you say the same when Fax stream a match/radio and its home commentary.

It’s even sadder when some fans can’t see past their own club and the way things have and are been bent and manipulated for the sake of Bradford, just like Bradford whilst under the leadership of Nigel Wood deliberately lied and inflated their attendance figures specifically to gain IMG points and the only thing dishonesty merits is the condemnation your club is receiving, you are bringing it on yourself’s so don’t blame everyone else for your conduct. 

As regards streaming when the deal for Championship games to be streamed was on the table Bradford was one of the clubs who voted against it and with the vote being close it was the RFL that had the final say and guess who they sided with and no TV deal as a result so don’t twist things round as if your doing a big favour.

I thought we had the better of the first 40 so was disappointed to go in level. Our starting middles Douglas Calcott and Dixon all set a good platform for us one of the problems we had was they all was off the pitch at the same time leaving us little punch up front, Plus for some bizarre reason we started putting high  kicks to Saltys corner where he was up against a winger much taller than him. Nofoaluma was again one of our best performers his running metres must be high i hope we can keep him for next year.Woodburn-hall came on for Hansen with about 20 to go for me he should of started at fullback with Nofoaluma on the wing which wouldn't affect his influence on the game. Woody's ball handling skills from fullback would add to our attack plus we would have more overall pace in our backline. Last week and this we have fallen short against 2 of the strongest sides in the league which stings but unless we are going to put more money into the team we will continue to get these outcomes. The lack of any info coming from the board regarding the change in league structures and there plans for the club going forward is concerning to say the least. I appreciate there is a lot going on at the club but these issues need to be addressed.