RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Why ?
::Off-topic discussion.
Re: Why ? Wed Nov 24, 2021 7:49 am  

chissitt wrote:
chissitt Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:34 am
Posts: 8297
Member for 14 years
The Ghost of '99 wrote:
The standard line of the resolute defender of ANY party. To which the answer is, almost certainly.

Slight edit to your post here squire, but other than that I'll have to agree with you as your the voice of impartiality on all political matters.
Re: Why ? Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:14 am  

User avatarMild Rover wrote:
Mild Rover User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 12035
Location: Leicestershire.
Member for 15 years
chissitt wrote:
Will it be any easier under tuther lot? won't health care insurance take care of that?


In the same way it does in the US, perhaps (i.e. not really). There are substantial demographic issues that any party would face, but yes I honestly believe it’d be better under an government that wants to make public provision for universal healthcare based on need and free at the point of delivery, as far as is going to be feasible.


chissitt wrote:
They will if they are all lorry drivers.


But that is unlikely, innit? And in a few years those and a lot of other jobs seem likely to be lost to automation. That’s progress, but who shares in its benefits? Under the Tories my expectation is that a small number of people will benefit a great deal, with the outlook being bleaker for a much greater number.


chissitt wrote:
I'm quite shocked and surprised it's only the Tories that have a second job :shock:


It is massively disproportionately Tories. For example, among MPs who have worked as consultants in the last year, 30 are Conservatives, 1 is Labour and 1 is a Lib Dem. Even making allowances for there being more Tory MPs and their’s being the party in power, that is a big difference. Tbh, I don’t have a huge problem with second jobs per se. But they shouldn’t be selling access and influence.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 8:29 am  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 541
Member for 1 year
I am struggling with all this access to influence that Labour complain about - virtually the first thing they will do is repeal back the existing union legislation - who funds the labour party?
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 8:53 am  
The Ghost of '99 User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: Desperation Island
Member for 16 years
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
I am struggling with all this access to influence that Labour complain about - virtually the first thing they will do is repeal back the existing union legislation - who funds the labour party?

The unions represent labour. Influence might cause a Labour government to enact pro-worker legislation (tbh this stuff is so popular with the public it wouldn't need access or bribe).

The Tories are funded by hugely wealthy individuals who they are stuffing billions of pounds of government contracts to.

Even the most one-eyed could see a difference. Nice attempt at whatabouttery though.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:11 am  
Scarlet Pimpernell Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:43 pm
Posts: 3021
Member for 8 years
I didn’t see many Unions being granted PPE contracts via the government fast track for friends or by any means actually. To donate to the Labour Party a union member must actually agree to do so.
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:32 am  

wotsupcas wrote:
wotsupcas Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:25 pm
Posts: 664
Member for 8 years
Mild Rover wrote:
In the same way it does in the US, perhaps (i.e. not really). There are substantial demographic issues that any party would face, but yes I honestly believe it’d be better under an government that wants to make public provision for universal healthcare based on need and free at the point of delivery, as far as is going to be feasible.


But that is unlikely, innit? And in a few years those and a lot of other jobs seem likely to be lost to automation. That’s progress, but who shares in its benefits? Under the Tories my expectation is that a small number of people will benefit a great deal, with the outlook being bleaker for a much greater number.


It is massively disproportionately Tories. For example, among MPs who have worked as consultants in the last year, 30 are Conservatives, 1 is Labour and 1 is a Lib Dem. Even making allowances for there being more Tory MPs and their’s being the party in power, that is a big difference. Tbh, I don’t have a huge problem with second jobs per se. But they shouldn’t be selling access and influence.

Nice bit of goal post moving there mate. Are we talking about any second job or just consultants? Or does just counting consultants help with the Tory bashing?
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 1:26 pm  

User avatarwrencat1873 wrote:
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 16463
Member for 11 years
wotsupcas wrote:
Nice bit of goal post moving there mate. Are we talking about any second job or just consultants? Or does just counting consultants help with the Tory bashing?


No need for Tory bashing, thanks to the Clown Leader, their own infighting is on the increase.
The comedy value is the highlight of Boris's premiership.

As for goalpost moving, Boris is definitely the man for that particular job

Would you like a list to help you ?
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 2:03 pm  

wotsupcas wrote:
wotsupcas Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:25 pm
Posts: 664
Member for 8 years
wrencat1873 wrote:
No need for Tory bashing, thanks to the Clown Leader, their own infighting is on the increase.
The comedy value is the highlight of Boris's premiership.

As for goalpost moving, Boris is definitely the man for that particular job

Would you like a list to help you ?

Totally irrelevant reply to the question I asked but crack on if it keeps you happy.
And if there's no need for Tory bashing why on earth do you and your mates do it day after day after day after day....?
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 4:01 pm  

User avatarWillzay wrote:
Willzay User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:58 pm
Posts: 10989
Member for 12 years
Because they’re a pack of lying corrupt bar stewards and their voters aren’t much better.
Profit over Lives - The Tory way
Re: Why ? Thu Nov 25, 2021 4:12 pm  

User avatarwrencat1873 wrote:
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 16463
Member for 11 years
wotsupcas wrote:
Totally irrelevant reply to the question I asked but crack on if it keeps you happy.
And if there's no need for Tory bashing why on earth do you and your mates do it day after day after day after day....?


It's all good sport isn't it.
I love how you called out others for goal post moving though, absolutely hilarious.

Perhaps you could tell us a tale about Peppa Pig ?
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], TURFEDOUT and 136 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to The Sin Bin


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORD
19.25Million +21,522 ↑1178,8319,567
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre

TABLES:
Sat 29th Jan 15:00
 CH
Leigh
v
Whitehaven
Sun 30th Jan 14:00
 CH
Workington
v
Newcastle
Sun 30th Jan 15:00
 CH
LondonB
v
Widnes
Sun 30th Jan 15:00
 CH
Barrow
v
Sheffield
Sun 30th Jan 15:00
 CH
Dewsbury
v
Bradford
Sun 30th Jan 15:00
 CH
Batley
v
Halifax
Mon 31st Jan 19:45
 CH
York
v
Featherstone
Sat 5th Feb 15:00
 CH
Newcastle
v
Batley
Sun 6th Feb 15:00
 CH
Bradford
v
Sheffield
Sun 6th Feb 15:00
 CH
Halifax
v
LondonB
Sun 6th Feb 15:00
 CH
Whitehaven
v
Barrow
Sun 6th Feb 15:00
 CH
York
v
Dewsbury
Mon 7th Feb 19:45
 CH
Featherstone
v
Leigh
Thu 10th Feb 20:00
SL
St.Helens
v
Catalans
Fri 11th Feb 20:00
SL
Castleford
v
Salford
There are currently no matches to display.
Matches on TV
Mon 31st Jan
CH RND: 1 York-Featherstone
Mon 7th Feb
CH RND: 2 Featherstone-Leigh
Thu 10th Feb
SL RND: 1 St.Helens-Catalans
Fri 11th Feb
SL RND: 1 Hull KR-Wigan
Sat 12th Feb
SL RND: 1 Leeds-Warrington
SL RND: 1 Toulouse-Huddersfield
Thu 17th Feb
SL RND: 2 Warrington-Castleford
Fri 18th Feb
SL RND: 2 Wigan-Leeds
Sat 19th Feb
SL RND: 2 Hull FC-St.Helens
Thu 24th Feb
SL RND: 3 Leeds-Catalans
Fri 25th Feb
SL RND: 3 Hull KR-Salford
Thu 3rd Mar
SL RND: 4 Wakefield-Leeds
Fri 4th Mar
SL RND: 4 Warrington-Catalans
Thu 10th Mar
SL RND: 5 Leeds-Hull FC
Fri 11th Mar
SL RND: 5 St.Helens-Warrington
Sat 12th Mar
SL RND: 5 Huddersfield-Castleford
Thu 17th Mar
SL RND: 6 Wigan-Castleford
Fri 18th Mar
SL RND: 6 Salford-Leeds
Sat 19th Mar
SL RND: 6 Warrington-Wakefield
Thu 31st Mar
SL RND: 7 Wigan-Hull FC
Betfred Championship 2022 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Betfred League One 2022 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Betfred Super League XXVII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
RLFANS Recent Posts


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!









X
::::::::