Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:57 pm  

Locko's Luck wrote:

I like Jamie P, unfortunately he's either going through a bad patch or starting to fade away as a top line player. Not international class anymore, that is for sure.

See he was a tad wound up by Schofield yesterday as well.

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:55 pm  

Wigan bashing the frogs at the minute......love to see wigan in a close game as they cant kick a thing,got Mossop kicking today

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:17 pm  

Good win for Wigan. Lon/wid 18-18 latest

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:31 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

Wigan bashing the frogs at the minute......love to see wigan in a close game as they cant kick a thing,got Mossop kicking today

Mossop wern't kicking, charnley kicked 2 (missed a couple of sitters aswell) and sam kicked 2/2

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:40 pm  

Go joint 3rd if we can beat wakey .... Come on u ullllaaaarr

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:54 pm  

Pjhoe wrote:

Go joint 3rd if we can beat wakey .... Come on u ullllaaaarr

No, we go fourth. Or third in the unlikely event that we win by 70 or more. There's no such thing as joint third.

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:10 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

No, we go fourth. Or third in the unlikely event that we win by 70 or more. There's no such thing as joint third.

So we go level on points with third. What's the big deal, really?

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:11 pm  

If two teams have scored and let in the same amount of points , won and drawn the same then they would be joint , so there is such a thing as joint 3rd but I get your point

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:59 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

So we go level on points with third. What's the big deal, really?

No big deal. I'm just pointing out (correctly) that there is no such thing as joint third.

Re: This weekend's games : Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:37 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

No big deal. I'm just pointing out (correctly) that there is no such thing as joint third.

Yes there is .