[Wildthing]

Re: £355,921 : Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:06 pm  

PM each other if you wish to continue chaps.
Amusing as it is.

Back on topic ...

Re: £355,921 : Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:31 pm  

The Avenger wrote:

You do talk utter claptrap!

My knowledge of Rugby League clearly buries your quaint and antiquated view of the game, for a little fat bloke who never made the slightest impact on the game as a player, coach, administrator or anything really, you have a big opinion of yourself.

You know him well I see lol

Re: £355,921 : Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:35 pm  

vastman wrote:

Nothing to do with the mess left by the Labour government of 14 years then, it will be Thatchers fault next

Anyway back to Rugby League, something else you know little about

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I think you will find it was 13 years 1997 to 2010 but what do I know

Oh dear, not a lot about rithmatics apparently, fingers' are useful for other things than keyboard's.

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:00 am  

chissitt wrote:

Oh dear, not a lot about rithmatics apparently, fingers' are useful for other things than keyboard's.

[Wildthing]

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:26 am  

Come on guys.
I don't want to lock this topic as its one of the best news stories we have had on here probably all year.

Last warning ... back on topic!

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:31 am  

Some context, Salford made a £5m loss and finished 2 points ahead of Trinity.

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 10:17 am  

£2.5 million per point then? I'm surprised that wasn't one of the Dr's suggestions during last season - he came up with several other madcap schemes to make sure his personal wealth advantaged Salford.

If I were a Salford fan, I'd be a bit nervy about his continued involvement - he's chucked good money after bad and ended up with nothing to show; and I gather their ST sales are around the same as ours?

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:30 am  

bren2k wrote:

£2.5 million per point then? I'm surprised that wasn't one of the Dr's suggestions during last season - he came up with several other madcap schemes to make sure his personal wealth advantaged Salford.

If I were a Salford fan, I'd be a bit nervy about his continued involvement - he's chucked good money after bad and ended up with nothing to show; and I gather their ST sales are around the same as ours?

Given time (and who knows how long he will stay there for), Koucash will make Salford a top 8 competitive side BUT, unless the salary cap is abandoned, it will take 20 years plus to turn them into contenders.

The £5 million figure is astonishing. Is this the actual loss on the balance sheet or, the total spend (on contracts) since he came in ?

[PopTart]

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:45 am  

bren2k wrote:

£2.5 million per point then? I'm surprised that wasn't one of the Dr's suggestions during last season - he came up with several other madcap schemes to make sure his personal wealth advantaged Salford.

If I were a Salford fan, I'd be a bit nervy about his continued involvement - he's chucked good money after bad and ended up with nothing to show; and I gather their ST sales are around the same as ours?

The Dr isn't the issue. He's bringing money to the club. It's the people spending the money.

Re: £355,921 : Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:48 am  

PopTart wrote:

The Dr isn't the issue. He's bringing money to the club. It's the people spending the money.

Disagree PT, without the Dr, they would be sunk !