Is there going to be the risk of a kit clash in the England vs Australia game?? red and white hoops, against pale blue and maroon hoops isn't a huge contrast in kits.
was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:
You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
Is there going to be the risk of a kit clash in the England vs Australia game?? red and white hoops, against pale blue and maroon hoops isn't a huge contrast in kits.
so long as the ref can tell which is which, then the aussies should get the result they desire
I agree with earlier post about the badge meaning more than the kit colours. It's just a shame that the England RL badge looks like it was knocked up by a GCSE Technology student in MS Paint...
Is there going to be the risk of a kit clash in the England vs Australia game?? red and white hoops, against pale blue and maroon hoops isn't a huge contrast in kits.
I'm still not sure why - under normal circumstances - the Australia green and gold chevron and New Zealand black and white chevron kit isn't considered a kit clash!
I'm still not sure why - under normal circumstances - the Australia green and gold chevron and New Zealand black and white chevron kit isn't considered a kit clash!
Are you still watching in black & white, the rest of us have colour TV now
I'm still not sure why - under normal circumstances - the Australia green and gold chevron and New Zealand black and white chevron kit isn't considered a kit clash!
Two very dark kits. I agree.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], RobRiches and 368 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...
_zps67e534e4.jpg)
