FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

  
 Current LIVE TV Match : Leeds Rhinos 24 - 30 Huddersfield Giants LIVE ON SKY SPORTS Clune Try, Not Converted
 Current LIVE TV Match : St.Helens 58 - 0 Hull FC LIVE ON SKY SPORTS Full Time.
 Current LIVE TV Match : Wigan Warriors 36 - 8 Castleford Tigers LIVE ON SKY SPORTS Miski Try, Smith Goal
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - DULLS IN ADMIN
RankPostsTeam
International Star2010No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 14 201113 years248th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
10th Mar 24 22:033rd Mar 24 01:35LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:58 pm  
wrencat1873 wrote:
It's true, we dont know but, they did receive a loan from the RFL last season and the RFL then took over the lease on Odsal due to non payment of the loan. Therefore, regardless of the findings during the licensing process, I think its fair to say the RFL knew the true picture but, at the time it would have been unthinkable to "demote" the Bulls and allow Halifax to be promoted.
Even with the benefit of hindsight, it would have been a very difficult call.

I can't honestly see why, provided they knew the true picture, their place should have gone to Fax, which I had a funny feeling was what was going to happen, given this was the worst kept secret in years. Halifax should feel rightly agrieved. It was us they were upset with, now look. This absolutely stinks. RL loses credibility with me as a fan. God knows what the greater sporting world think. But this is exactly what I thought franchising would bring. People in boardrooms cannot be allowed to decide who has the right to play at the top table. It is too open to prejudice and corruption and the sooner it comes to an end the better. One up, one down, provided your ground meets definite, crystal clear, objective criteria.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4809No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 18 200519 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
7th Mar 16 23:5215th Nov 15 15:57LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
"I know guys that pay £25 for a facial up north"
"If that season review DVD was an A-level entry, it'd fail"

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:37 pm  
Slugger McBatt wrote:
I don't agree that the game is in tatters. It's just that one club decided to run itself at a level it couldn't afford. It is notable that there has been no attempt to recoup money by selling assets, i.e., players, and it seems that the Bulls club wants its cake and eat it. It wants to put a top drawer team on the park, regardless of whether or not it can afford it.

The situation in each club has been different. Crusaders were saddled with debts accrued by the previous owner. We were hit for six by the decision to call in the ground for PI, as otherwise we would have received a payment that would have sorted the tax bill out. Bulls have been relying on crowds of 10,000 that only bring in gate receipts as if there were 4,000, due to the cut prces.


Quoted for truth. Easier just to blame the RFL as the easy option than look at the real reasons. Any sports club, not just rugby league, in the most part gets into trouble because of bad management, spending money they don't have, or a mix of the two.

It's conveniently forgotten that Widnes went bust when P&R was in place. They gambled and lost to Cas in the Grand Final. Not the only ones of course.
bren2k 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach15521
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 24 201014 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
5th May 20 12:495th May 20 08:10LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Ossett

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:16 pm  
t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:
Quoted for truth. Easier just to blame the RFL as the easy option than look at the real reasons.


I would agree with you - IF the RFL hadn't just subjected the Bulls to a robust and thorough process of financial scrutiny, and declared them a fit and proper club to receive a SL franchise.

The real issue here is that they've now done so with two clubs and either failed to identify the impending financial meltdown at all, or identified it but failed to act.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach6292
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 24 200717 years201st
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Apr 24 05:1528th Feb 24 12:27LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Over there
Signature
EVENTUALLY, WE'LL WIN SOMETHING, ,MAYBE, IF I'M STILL ALIVE THEN

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:59 pm  
bren2k wrote:
The real issue here is that they've now done so with two clubs and either failed to identify the impending financial meltdown at all, or identified it but failed to act.


I suppose partially correct, if you mean the Crusaders, because of course the RFL did identify the problems and twisted their arms to drop out.

Where the RFL is to blame is the box where there has to be a certain number of members. That is why clubs like Bulls and us offer season ticket prices that are unrealistic. Although our gates are up 30%, I bet our takings aren't. The difference is that we are building a groundswell to take to a new ground. The Bulls strategy was madness. 10,000 tickets at £60 a pop equates to a 3,000 crowd paying full price, but they wanted to put on the park a team that equated to 10,000 paying full price.

Some simple maths. £180 is the going rate for a normal season ticket. Let's say the Bulls could shift 3,000 season tickets at that price. That is just about what 10,000 tickets at £60 brings in. But the Bulls can get 10,000 a week, and so the other 7,000 have paid combinations of full price and concessions. If we average that out at £15 per ticket, that is £105,000 per home game. If we multiply that by the home games per season, that is £1,365,000 they are throwing away. Now, someone remind me how much extra they need a season to survive.

:IDEA:
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach376
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 10 200915 years273rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Apr 24 01:2916th Mar 24 01:00LINK
Milestone Posts
250
500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:46 pm  
Unfortunately the Bulls fans thought the Wakey fans where giving them duff info about not giving the £1/2 million to help save the club, but if they had gone into admin at the start the supporters trust would have 1/2 mill ready to invest.
Although i`ve never been one of there biggest supporters , its the fans I feel for.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9974
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 07 200915 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
18th Feb 19 20:425th Feb 19 20:58LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the shed aerating my wort!!!
Signature
READ THE AUP:
//forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:24 am  
bren2k wrote:
I would agree with you - IF the RFL hadn't just subjected the Bulls to a robust and thorough process of financial scrutiny, and declared them a fit and proper club to receive a SL franchise.

The real issue here is that they've now done so with two clubs and either failed to identify the impending financial meltdown at all, or identified it but failed to act.

Of course they know, but because they have usually been covertly complicit to some dodgy course of actions prior to said club going pop, they adopt the stance of doing nothing and hoping it won't happen.
It's obvious to the wider RL public, why do you think it isn't to the RFL?
Just because they and the Sky peddle the myth that all is well in the SL garden, it doesn't mean they know it to be otherwise.
Last edited by kinleycat on Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
RankPostsTeam
International Star2270No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 18 201014 years283rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
18th Apr 24 22:2717th Apr 24 17:57LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:28 am  
They had ten days to come up with a buyer. If i was Caisley i would wait 5 days to see if anyone comes forward. If no one comes forward then i would look at selling as many players as possible to satisfy administrators then take over the club and start again. Think it was Guilfoyle who said on radio that the players wouldn't bring that much. I don't agree they have quite a number of players who are being well courted by several clubs. If Caisley works well with admin team i am sure they will be able to do deals to satisfy all parties. When we had players sold by admin team it was a different situation Glover didn't have control of the club and therefore couldn't have any say on what happened. Maybe once this is done and a big chunk of debt is paid off it might trigger some one to come forward with less outlay of money to be risked again.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17880
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years48th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 18:2314th Apr 24 09:14LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:56 am  
charlie63wildcat wrote:
I agree totally appalling. I was aghast at the appeal. My Hull supporting mate even chucked money in at their game at the KC; I told him he was nuts. A failing sports club is NOT A CHARITY. It was a disgusting abuse of people's good will and love for their club and, as suspected, was also a waste of time. Shame on all concerned and the RFL for allowing it to happen.


Well said Charlie.
What gets me is the fact that they asked their fans (and the wider rugby league public) to donate cash to save tham and with a bit more honesty, instead of wishful thinking, this cash could have been used to breathe life into the "new" Bulls, but now it is lost and in the longer term this will damage their efforts to gain support .
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17880
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years48th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 18:2314th Apr 24 09:14LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:02 am  
supercat wrote:
They had ten days to come up with a buyer. If i was Caisley i would wait 5 days to see if anyone comes forward. If no one comes forward then i would look at selling as many players as possible to satisfy administrators then take over the club and start again. Think it was Guilfoyle who said on radio that the players wouldn't bring that much. I don't agree they have quite a number of players who are being well courted by several clubs. If Caisley works well with admin team i am sure they will be able to do deals to satisfy all parties. When we had players sold by admin team it was a different situation Glover didn't have control of the club and therefore couldn't have any say on what happened. Maybe once this is done and a big chunk of debt is paid off it might trigger some one to come forward with less outlay of money to be risked again.


A the 10 days count down, they will be more inclined to sell their top players, indeed it will become a necessesity, however, this means that maybe Leeds, Wigan, Warrington and Hull will be the destination for these players as these few clubs are the only ones with significant cash at their disposal..
dboy 
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4134
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 12 200519 years111th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
19th Apr 24 12:2018th Apr 24 15:37LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Barnsley

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:31 am  
wrencat1873 wrote:
A the 10 days count down, they will be more inclined to sell their top players,...


By 10 days, if no buyer is found, all the players will be free agents anyway - no fees to pay.

This is why players get sold for less than their market worth in these situations - the administrator will want to realise whatevercash he can.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1315trinity, brettoncat, cocker, djcool, Khlav Kalash, REDWHITEANDBLUE and 366 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to Wakefield Trinity


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Saints A next up - IAKOW
Chris71
131
1m
Smith out ASAP
tomlufc
272
2m
RD 8 Huddersfield Giants H
Seth
71
3m
Why have so many big clubs given up on the field
RobRiches
21
4m
TV Games - Not Hull
B0NES
1474
28m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Shabino
8796
28m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Chris71
215
33m
New Super League shirts in time for Christmas
orangeman
139
44m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
57193
45m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
35358
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
14s
Why have so many big clubs given up on the field
RobRiches
21
15s
TV games not Wire
karetaker
2914
32s
cas redevelpment goes to plan B
homme vaste
230
43s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Chris71
215
47s
Squad for Leigh
karetaker
31
1m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Shabino
8796
1m
Fitzgibbon
just_browny
33
1m
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
Zig
2066
1m
St Helens
wirecation
238
1m
Shopping list for 2025
ComeOnYouUll
946
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Squad players
BigTime
1
TODAY
21 Man Squads - Wire v Leopards v
Lower Crease
12
TODAY
Squad for Leigh
karetaker
31
TODAY
FINANCES
cowfax
14
TODAY
AI predictions
Rugby Raider
3
TODAY
Sheffield Game
REDWHITEANDB
3
TODAY
Injury update
dboy
11
TODAY
Seagulls
Hudd-Shay
23
TODAY
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
Wires71
13
TODAY
Castleford at home
DannyT
37
TODAY
David Armstrong potential signing
LeythIg
10
TODAY
France v England Internationals Confirmed for 29th June 2024
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
France v England International..
878
Warrington Stun St Helens In C..
1626
2024 Challenge Cup Semi-Finals..
1314
Wigan Warriors Demolish Woeful..
1434
Hull KR Eliminate the Cup Hold..
1509
Bradford Bulls Come From Behin..
1927
Bradford Bulls Beat Feathersto..
2435
Giants Thrash FC Again For Top..
2392
Warrington Brush Aside The Rhi..
1966
Wigan Coast to Victory over Le..
2040
Giants Come From Behind For Ea..
2290
Salford Red Devils Defeat Leig..
2807
Catalans Dragons Win See-Saw E..
2236
St Helens Win Derby Game Over ..
2243
Early Season Double for Hull K..
2192