Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:53 pm  

suffolk rhinos wrote:

congratulations to saints, wigin and wane got what you deserved feck all, had a quick read on this site saturday night just after the game, dear oh dear 14 vs 12, the rfl got the result they wanted, the refs bent etc your club is detested throughout the RL world and you finish the season potless and your reputation is lower than a rattlesnakes belly

Thankfully we still have Leeds, the most upstanding, gentlemanly club in the history of organised sports ...

Didnt a judge once say of two Leeds players "Each of you brought disgrace on the game of rugby league, on your clubs and most of all on yourselves" ... I guess our reputation is about as low as that ...

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:10 pm  

There are plenty of threads you guys can go on without coming on this one....

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:28 pm  

Northampton_Saint wrote:

Tell me about it - it's not easy having mirrors in your house when you're as beautiful as I am, believe me. I have to cover them all up in the morning so I can go to work instead of staring at myself all day. It's a genuine problem and I'd appreciate a little sensitivity about it if you don't mind.

No problem Mr. Wellens. With an issue that big, you deserve some space to get yourself right.

Good luck.

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:50 pm  

Northampton_Saint wrote:

Let's play hypotheticals - let's say Saints go into the game on Saturday with Walsh, Lomax and Wilkin all fit, while Wigan go in with Smith, O'Loughlin and Bowen all injured with whoever playing in their place instead. And then let's say 2 minutes into the game Amor gets sent off for taking Green permanently out of the game with a shitehouse cheapshot. Question: with 13 (+3) Pies playing 12 (+4) Saints for 78 minutes in that situation, do Wigan have any chance of winning? Of course not - you'd have gotten mullered, man advantage or otherwise. So less of the "best team lost" cobblers and playing the "if" game that some of you are indulging yourselves in if you please.

Saints overcame frightening odds to win an unbelievable and incredibly unlikely backs-to-the-wall victory no matter what kind of gloss or amelioration you want to put on it. We suffered from infinitely way more adversity both before and during the game than you did. We were bitty and scrappy and lacked organisation and composure during the game but should have been a whole lot worse off under the circumstances. And we still won anyway.

Glad we've got that sorted. As it goes I think we'd have mullered you with a man advantage no matter who the personel. Haven't you lot been telling us all season that it doesn't seem to matter who wears the jerseys as our systems ensure we play exactly the same way? Without the three players you mentioned we'd have had Bateman to start and probably Scott Taylor on the bench and probably Hampshire to replace Bowen (many would say that was an improvement anyway!) By the way, just to keep the analogy even, McIlorum would have been playing too. So that's Taylor, Hamphire, McIlorum and 1 other player (Goulding or another forward) in and O'loughlin, Bowen and Smith out. With a man advantage for practically the full game that side would have caned you!

Re: Gloating thread : Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:18 pm  

Mash Butty wrote:

For all the gloaters on here I have one question, Did your penis stand on end when you saw Wigan lose? You should really turn yourself in to the authorities. Im proud of the 12 players they played amazing

If seeing your pack getting smashed to bits by 2 19 year olds is "playing amazing" then yep, you're right.

Regards

King James

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:16 pm  

Phuzzy wrote:

As it goes I think we'd have mullered you with a man advantage no matter who the personel.

Actually I find it quite sweet that you can even pretend to believe that. Bless. Anything to help you ease the pain is fine by me. Nothing wrong with a healthy fantasy life as my wife the purple unicorn always used to tell me.

"We'd have beat you 13 v 12 no matter what the personnel"... Just simply great material... That phone you can hear in the background is "Britain's Got Talent" offering you an audition...

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:20 pm  

Jack Kerley wrote:

No problem Mr. Wellens. With an issue that big, you deserve some space to get yourself right.

Good luck.

Surprisingly enough I'm not Mr. Wellens but just one of thousands and thousands of other outstandingly attractive and charismatic Sintelliners. I appreciate that there being so many of us can easily confuse someone coming from a town exclusively populated by deformed mutants, so I'll let you off this time. No need to thank me.

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:15 am  

Northampton_Saint wrote:

:lol:

Actually I find it quite sweet that you can even pretend to believe that. Bless. Anything to help you ease the pain is fine by me. Nothing wrong with a healthy fantasy life as my wife the purple unicorn always used to tell me.

"We'd have beat you 13 v 12 no matter what the personnel"... Just simply great material... That phone you can hear in the background is "Britain's Got Talent" offering you an audition...

Are you seriously that simple? There was the personnel that took the field and you offered an alternative. I answered that if we had the man advantage we would win whichever personnel you chose and went on to explain why. Sorry if you couldn't understand. I didn't realise I was replying to a simpleton. Next time I'll take into consideration your obvious stupidity and answer in words of one syllable wherever possible. Well done on your gibberish above by the way. Here's a radical thought; Why don't you explain why the alternative team I offered wouldn't beat a 12 man Saints? Or would that actually require a degree of reasoning that's beyond you? Wouldn't want to tax your tiny brain too much now, would we?

Edit: Actually, don't bother. I've just read the rest of your posts....

Re: Gloating thread - THIS THREAD ONLY : Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:13 am  

Phuzzy wrote:

Are you seriously that simple? There was the personnel that took the field and you offered an alternative. I answered that if we had the man advantage we would win whichever personnel you chose and went on to explain why. Sorry if you couldn't understand. I didn't realise I was replying to a simpleton. Next time I'll take into consideration your obvious stupidity and answer in words of one syllable wherever possible. Well done on your gibberish above by the way. Here's a radical thought; Why don't you explain why the alternative team I offered wouldn't beat a 12 man Saints? Or would that actually require a degree of reasoning that's beyond you? Wouldn't want to tax your tiny brain too much now, would we?

Edit: Actually, don't bother. I've just read the rest of your posts....

You maintain "any Wigan side would have beaten any Saints side 13v12 no matter the personnel" as an argument and I'm the simple one?

I mean: come on... I'm sure even you must be at least a little puzzled by how it is that, given how much better your reserves apparently are than our first choice players ( ), your first choice players still somehow managed to get their asses presented to them on a plate by our reserves on Saturday.

Do yourself a favour sunshine and feign an injury so you can leave the thread with honour (relatively) intact and don't have to keep on taking punishment. You are just so far beneath my level it's embarrassing, frankly.

Re: Gloating thread : Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:51 am  

Lebron James wrote:

If seeing your pack getting smashed to bits by 2 19 year olds is "playing amazing" then yep, you're right.

Regards

King James

No matter how many times you say it, it still won't be true.