G1 wrote:
I actually think, when you look at some of the surprising results this season (just look at last weekend's results) we're already getting there without the need for this nonsense.
I don't think so.
Suprising results still only occur when the better team plays crap. In the NRL you get suprise results and the teams are going set for set, offload for offload, break for break, hit for hit. Let's say you tune in to London v Wigan on sky, for london to win you basically need wigan to have an awful completion rate, a soft defence and to generally not seem 'up' for the game.
I guess super league is getting better in comparison with itself years ago in the sense that if someone is off their game there is a much greater chance of an upset than there used to be.
I like the look of new structure. Theres going to be more crunch games and it will be harder to win the title. Gone are the days you can mickey through half the games, beat your rivals a couple of times and pretty much be guaranteed a grand final place if you finish in the top 2.