Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:18 pm  

Him wrote:

I work for an insurance company!

Explains a lot !

Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Sun Jul 27, 2014 8:21 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Explains a lot !

It was twice as much money and a lot less responsibility and stress than my previous job doing exactly the same thing in the NHS!

Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:46 am  

Him wrote:

:)
It was twice as much money and a lot less responsibility and stress than my previous job doing exactly the same thing in the NHS!

capitalism at work......bloody tories

Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:41 am  

Everyone has got bringing the company into disrepute in their contract.

There was a firefighter sacked for posting on Twitter or Facebook not long ago.

That's far less controversial than going out and getting wasted.

Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:48 pm  

CrusaderPete wrote:

Yes but it wasn't in their contract was it?

If it was, then they have to expect to be sacked, but if it's not there.....

Of course it's in their contract, especially if you have the track record of Carney!

We do have employment law in Australia you know.

Re: Should the RFL follow the NRLs proposal? : Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:07 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

capitalism at work......bloody tories

More the effects of an underfunded and overly target driven NHS. Bloody Labour & Tories.

We were storing records at a total cost to the NHS of 7p per item. After I left they were put out to private storage companies at an average cost of 45p per item. Doesn't sound a lot but bear in mind we were storing over 3m individual items. Taking into account they destroyed (and now don't keep) records before the end of their retention period against NHS directives, I make it as a waste of approx £750,000 per year for a lesser service.

Totally OT I know, it just annoys me.