Re: MOS so far? : Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:01 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

They used to have a player of the year and a MOS. The scenario you are seeing is exactly what.

Yes, the input Clark is having propels him to a position of possibly been the player of the year in Super League.

But MOS is and should be different, and should be more reflective of other roles. Clark doesn't have an influence on others, he feeds off others and is exceptional at it. Without those others though, he would not be doing it. Clearly a quality player and one we would all want in our team. Players like Peacock influence others and lay the foundation for others to excel, much more aligned to that MOS tag.

We have discussed this before and it's complete and utter tosh.

He scored a try from nothing yesterday after the previous two tackles had been lost. Only a biased Leeds fan would try and claim something that isn't true.

Re: MOS so far? : Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:11 pm  

Peacock should be mos by a mile. Any one else wins it it would be a travesty, But Leeds players don't win mos.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:56 pm  

Just a few games left now, have people still got the same opinions on who gets the award?

Shenton has impressed for Cas and although i dont think he will get it should have done enough to regain a test spot.Walsh has been great for Saints at times but the injuries put him out of the running.I still take Peacock as the slight front runner but there isn't alot between him, Hill and Roby.The next 6 weeks could be very important in seeing who can pull out the big performances to nudge themselves over the line.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:56 pm  

Asotasi.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:10 pm  

Wellens might be a good late bet, very influential player against the opposition in an injury ravaged team.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:33 pm  

I think Darryl Clarke has edged ahead of Chris Hill with Zac Hardaker making a late bid it

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:50 pm  

But for " the incident" Hardaker would have been a clear contender. O'Loughlin would have been with more game time

As it is Peacock and Clark stand out a mile.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:50 pm  

But for " the incident" Hardaker would have been a clear contender. O'Loughlin would have been with more game time

As it is Peacock and Clark stand out a mile.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:06 pm  

Hill & Clark.

Re: MOS so far? : Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:34 pm  

craigizzard wrote:

But for " the incident" Hardaker would have been a clear contender. O'Loughlin would have been with more game time

As it is Peacock and Clark stand out a mile.

That shows the weakness of SL, that Jamie Peacock (great player) can still considered for mos.