ulverstonRhino wrote:
I like Carney, McDermott & O'Conner, the rest are cr*p.
Eddy H is past it, far too many mistakes.
I think O'Connor is awful. He can't speak well enough and usually just comes out with cliches. Also he has a habit of almost rabidly defending his former teams, especially Widnes, and his friends. A good example being the recent Gareth Hock incident. O'Connor was embarrassing on Boots n All defending Hock. We'd just been played the video of Hock charging the ref. Even the most ardent defender of Hock would say he didn't do enough to avoid the contact. But Terry believed it was entirely accidental, Hock didn't change his line and didn't dip his shoulder. In complete contradiction to the video we'd just been shown.
He should be consigned to doing daft, "fun" segments on Boots n All at the most.
It's not a criticism of him as a man, he's just rubbish on TV and I've never quite understood why he's been given so much responsibility and airtime on Sky.
Carney & Wells are the saviours. Their, all too brief, analysis of each half is the high point by a country mile. I also prefer Carney as main presenter now too.
If Sky could just keep Eddie to commentating and not attempted analysis, or droning on about the same thing over and over again, or massively over-hyping one player that'd be a great start. Because when he commentates he's pretty good in my opinion.
Stevo can be a bit annoying sometimes, but he still gets a bit of a pass because he's a legend.
Clarke, I just wish he would stop trying to be the fan of one team or another and be a professional. If he did he'd have some decent points to make.
That'd do then for me.
Carney as main presenter.
Eddie & Stevo as commentators only, with maybe Clarke as a 3rd if he can be more professional.
And a studio guest to discuss the game with Carney and Wells' analysis bit too.
Simples. No need for anyone else. Too many times the commentary team is a discussion group, so get rid of 1 or 2 of them and concentrate on commentating.
