Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:19 pm  

As long as Sir Kev isn't playing on Friday night against the greatest team ever to play out of Barton Graveyard Stadium, I don't care how many more games he misses after that..

To be fair, he is the Gary Lineker of RL, fantastic talent and gentleman who annoys only a few

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:55 pm  

2 game suspension following early guilty plea confirmed.

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:06 pm  

craigizzard wrote:

2 game suspension following early guilty plea confirmed.

link????

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:13 pm  

PaulCam1972 wrote:

link????

Leeds Rhinos official twitter

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:36 pm  

https://twitter.com/leedsrhinos/status/ ... 4203271168

https://twitter.com/leedsrhinos/status/ ... 4203271168

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:05 pm  

Right decision IMO.

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:57 pm  

Fair decision based only on his good record. It was out of character.
Sure they'll be an over reaction from some because he's called Kevin Sinfield.

I shouldn't wonder because it's irrelevant BUT if the CC cup was in 2 weeks would he still have copped a 2 match ban.
Bad faith in the justice system on my part and would say No!

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:54 pm  

Nowt against Leeds or Sinfield - but that decision stinks.

Obviously nothing to do with the CC game in 3 weeks

EGP - fair enough
Sent off - fair enough

However out of character etc... there was intent and an aggressive act.

Homophobic abuse or spear tackle (Hardaker and Ferres) = 5 game ban (plus sending off for Ferres)
Deliberate head butt (Sinfield) = 2 game ban and sending off

Get the logic - do ya - do ya???

RFL maintains their usual standard of transparency, fairness and never ducks a difficult decision for the sake of the wider game then - NOT!!!

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:01 pm  

devoniangiant wrote:

Nowt against Leeds or Sinfield - but that decision stinks.

Obviously nothing to do with the CC game in 3 weeks

EGP - fair enough
Sent off - fair enough

However out of character etc... there was intent and an aggressive act.

Homophobic abuse or spear tackle (Hardaker and Ferres) = 5 game ban (plus sending off for Ferres)
Deliberate head butt (Sinfield) = 2 game ban and sending off

Get the logic - do ya - do ya???

RFL maintains their usual standard of transparency, fairness and never ducks a difficult decision for the sake of the wider game then - NOT!!!

Calm down - Have you even seen the headbutt? If we are issuing 5 matches ban for that then we may as well pack up now.

What would you subsequently give a player if they broke Luke Dorns nose and knocked him out with a headbutt?

Get some perspective. 2 games seems fair

Re: Did I really see Sinfield do that? : Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:09 pm  

So to sum up the last 20-odd pages -:

Peacock tried to strangle Dorn and apparently a poster has witnessed him do it 3 times now. Have you told the Old Bill?
Abletts first try was a double movement.
Sir Kev is akin to Luis Suarez.
Peacock tried to end Clarks career with a “crocodile death roll” which looked like it had been practised.
Leeds got every call in the 2nd half.
Sir Kev has been faking for 14 years and showed his true colours.
Sir Kev is to blame for the breakdown of society because apparently RL is a micro climate of how society goes, you don't punish people properly others go off and do what they like and things spiral from there. and

And after all that carnage the lousy RFL only hand out a 2 match ban.