[PopTart]

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:02 pm  

Harry is on tv now.
I don't see what everybody is moaning about.

He's great singing Oliver but Boy For Sale is his best song.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:40 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Moore was outstanding the rest of the pack was a disgrace! What ground would you drop Godinet for Seaker? MAthers on the wing was absolutely ridiculous. Sammut our most talented half at full back. Very odd indeed

I'm afraid we are in full agreement

However it was worse than that. What position was Sykes playing exactly, he wasn't the worst but was he in the halves

Mathers on the wing WHY?

Washedup on at all!

Godinet looks OK in the halves - not at hooker.

Harry Seacombe nowhere near up to speed to be the play maker.

Sammut utterly wasted at FB, he's a live wire who needs to be in the thick of it.

Of all the above it's the Sammut/Mathers bit I don't get.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:51 pm  

vastman wrote:

I'm afraid we are in full agreement

However it was worse than that. What position was Sykes playing exactly, he wasn't the worst but was he in the halves

Mathers on the wing WHY?

Washedup on at all!

Godinet looks OK in the halves - not at hooker.

Harry Seacombe nowhere near up to speed to be the play maker.

Sammut utterly wasted at FB, he's a live wire who needs to be in the thick of it.

Of all the above it's the Sammut/Mathers bit I don't get.

Basically WTF was agar thinking?

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:57 pm  

Afraid to say this lads but this switching players about only shows one thing and that's Agar is clutching at straws its busted and he don't know how to fix it.

[Wildthing]

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:32 pm  

Someone said before the game that with that team selection Agar was committing professional suicide.
Certainly worked out that way.

How come 99% of the supporters could see this?

Very very strange.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:52 pm  

I did notice Harry had his knee heavily strapped. Don't know if this was hampering his game.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:24 pm  

First time I've seen harry for what its worth my opinion of the lad , he played OK behind a beaten pack his kicking game was OK , his tackling was useless how anyone can suggest playing him at fullback the way clarkie shrugged him aside on a one on one to score answered that, not slating the kid but I slagged Issac john for his lack of pace for a stand off but this kid isn't in the same class as a footballer and is just as slow , as a half back I prefer wildie and allyou who say wildies a hooker ain't seen the lad play as a junior and have the same attitude as our coach not prepared to put a bit of time in developing players potential

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:17 pm  

I actually feel for Wildie he stood in for Aiton a couple of times and let no one down and had a decent game against Wigan.I thought when Aiton went we would have used him saying as money was tight but we went and brought McShane in.Not knocking McShane he has put effort in and at least tried to spark us into life.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:53 pm  

Mcshane needs spelling to get the best out of him. For me Wildie is the best man for that job.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:02 pm  

Spot on for me mate as McShane cant do 80 mins as we know and thats why I thought it madness letting Wildie go on loan.Mind you looking at Agars selections of late anything can happen.