James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:32 am  

Just watched the full game again..& he was really poor towards kr he made some very dodgy decisions against them..Caro been offside was the only 1 he got right..kr could have beaten us by 20 points! we was lucky to stay in the game to the end.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:35 am  

childs wasn't the VR

I don't think they got any of the no try decisions wrong

[Kosh]

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:38 am  

easthull fc fan wrote:

Just watched the full game again

Try it without the hangover.

Childs was his normal useless self and both sides suffered for it. The VR got every decision right bar the last one about whether Whiting touched the Burns' drop goal attempt.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:39 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

childs wasn't the VR

I don't think they got any of the no try decisions wrong

He sent a lot of decisions he could have made to them..the shoulder charge when larroyer scored was nothing..they happen every week, welham tackled in the air,theres a few it was a dodgy performance imho.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:41 am  

Kosh wrote:

Try it without the hangover.

Childs was his normal useless self and both sides suffered for it. The VR got every decision right bar the last one about whether Whiting touched the Burns' drop goal attempt.

Dont drink bud.. & we shouldnt give blatant penalties away to put ourselves in drop goal situations should we?

[Kosh]

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:43 am  

easthull fc fan wrote:

He sent a lot of decisions he could have made to them..the shoulder charge when larroyer scored was nothing..they happen every week, welham tackled in the air,theres a few it was a dodgy performance imho.

The shoulder charge is illegal and people get penalties and even bans for similar every week. And it was directly involved in the build-up to the try.

Welham tackled in the air was marginal, and not what the VR had been asked to rule on.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:44 am  

Kosh wrote:

Try it without the hangover.

Childs was his normal useless self and both sides suffered for it. The VR got every decision right bar the last one about whether Whiting touched the Burns' drop goal attempt.

Perfectly summed up. Maybe the OP made the crucial mistake of playing the video back with the sound turned up and actually believed the total garbage being spouted into his ears.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:44 am  

easthull fc fan wrote:

He sent a lot of decisions he could have made to them..the shoulder charge when larroyer scored was nothing..they happen every week, welham tackled in the air,theres a few it was a dodgy performance imho.

A shoulder charge is a shoulder charge and illegal. Blame burns not child. I also thought that it looked pretty clear that welham had 1 foot on the ground whilst he was tackled but we're talking split seconds in the decision and he certainly wasn't clearly in the air. If I was some kind of masochist I'd watch it back and come up with some decisions that went against us but I think I'll go for a dump instead

[Kosh]

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:45 am  

easthull fc fan wrote:

Dont drink bud.. & we shouldnt give blatant penalties away to put ourselves in drop goal situations should we?

No we shouldn't - although I thought the penalty was a tad harsh given what Rovers had got away with all night. But the fact is we successfully dealt with the situation and if not for the VR would have had possession on our 20 with seconds to go.

So if you want to whine about the VR you could make a case for his one mistake handing Rovers the points and denying us a draw.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:47 am  

Kosh wrote:

The shoulder charge is illegal and people get penalties and even bans for similar every week. And it was directly involved in the build-up to the try.

Welham tackled in the air was marginal, and not what the VR had been asked to rule on.

watch it again with no black & white binoculars on...worse shoulder contact gets ignored.