Re: Harry Seaker : Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:54 pm  

AGARs favourite course he Will get a game.

Re: Harry Seaker : Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:17 pm  

Good coaches can get the best out of players. Nick Scruton doesn't look motivated to me.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:35 am  

The time to play Harry in the halves was last week at Leeds. We didn't expect much from that game so why not give him a go then? Instead Agar has an inspired brainwave and puts him in the halves in a local derby along with multiple other experiments.. He clearly hasn't got a clue what he's doing. It's time for him to go. The big problem is that incredible three year contract!

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:43 am  

Who made the decision to sign him ?

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:52 am  

Just read what Harry had to say about the game on the club website.

His closing comments 'we just need a couple of more weeks to start gelling'

Seem to have heard that before somewhere.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:58 pm  

How many of you made the same comments about Johns after his first few games. I seem to remember most of you so called experts said much the same and yet he is now back playing in the NRL. I would suggest you refrain from expressing your opinions based on one game or you will be fulfilling the prophesy that "it is better to look a fool than to open your mouth and dispel any doubts".

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:09 pm  

And could it be that Johns who looked nothing like he does now was badly coached and wasn't allowed to play his natural game with us ?.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:24 pm  

les-goose wrote:

And could it be that Johns who looked nothing like he does now was badly coached and wasn't allowed to play his natural game with us ?.

He coulden't play with Tim Smith.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:29 pm  

I keep seeing and hearing comments about the team needing time to gel. I can't see how this is going to happen when the team line up is changing every week. Yesterday it seemed to be changing depending on whether we were attacking or defending. Settled sides gel.

Re: Harry Seaker : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:31 pm  

les-goose wrote:

And could it be that Johns who looked nothing like he does now was badly coached and wasn't allowed to play his natural game with us ?.

He wasnt one of Agars favourites so he was cast away into the background only to play when we had little hope of winning. Instead Agar pinned all our hopes on Smith and he began to misfire quite reguarly in the end when other teams worked us out.