BBC Sport's George Riley on Twitter: "Consortium CAN afford to buy Bradford but discussing if it can afford to cover losses. Any offer would depend on RFL handing back Odsal."
I would say more like the responsible temporary current or recent persons operating the flagship SL club. The club itself is one of the most renowned rugby league clubs on the planet, with a great history, and great fans. It is to the eternal shame of whoever is responsible on the 2012 watch that they have let the flagship hit the rocks, but those people are not one and the same as the flagship itself, which is a million times bigger than them.
But did "the club" become "flagship" by being irresponsible financially? Did "the club" pick up its grand recent history and all the trophies on the back of financial recklessness? Are Bradford just an "ordinary" club, relatively speaking?
Status: ONLINE Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:59 pm Posts: 31550 Location: watching out for low flying geese
Steve Fox wrote:
BBC Sport's George Riley on Twitter: "Consortium CAN afford to buy Bradford but discussing if it can afford to cover losses. Any offer would depend on RFL handing back Odsal."
As in, just giving it back for free?
kcab sfrawdder
It's not what you are inside
It's what you do , that defines who you are
Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity
Just to avoid any confusion, Starbug is the user name of Steven Pike
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:58 pm Posts: 3825 Location: Manchester
Steve Fox wrote:
BBC Sport's George Riley on Twitter: "Consortium CAN afford to buy Bradford but discussing if it can afford to cover losses. Any offer would depend on RFL handing back Odsal."
I think George got his words twisted.
Guilfoyle confirmed: “For the deal to go through we need the RFL to agree to us remaining in the top division and buying the ground back from them.
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:43 pm Posts: 14635 Location: Somewhere other than here
Paul124897 wrote:
Guilfoyle confirmed: “For the deal to go through we need the RFL to agree to us remaining in the top division and buying the ground back from them.
Sounds like blackmail to me.
The RFL didn't give such assurances to a potential owner of Wakefield when they were in administration so they shouldn't give them to any potential owner of Bradford either.
But I rather think they will.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:58 pm Posts: 3825 Location: Manchester
SaintsFan wrote:
Sounds like blackmail to me.
The RFL didn't give such assurances to a potential owner of Wakefield when they were in administration so they shouldn't give them to any potential owner of Bradford either.
But I rather think they will.
Why is it so easy for people to jump to conclusions? The exact news release in full sounds nothing like blackmail!
Bulls administrator Brendan Guilfoyle has warned that the deal for the club’s potential buyers would be dependent on conditions.
He explained that the RFL and the 13 other Super League clubs must consent to allow Bradford to remain in the top flight of English rugby league and permit the new owners to buy back the Odsal lease.
Guilfoyle confirmed: “For the deal to go through we need the RFL to agree to us remaining in the top division and buying the ground back from them.
“We need the other clubs to agree that Super League is a poorer place without us.”
The RFL didn't give such assurances to a potential owner of Wakefield when they were in administration so they shouldn't give them to any potential owner of Bradford either.
But I rather think they will.
The RFL refused to make such assurances to an extremely wealthy potential buyer of WTW, which is what prompted him to walk away from the deal.
Back then, a SL licence was NOT for sale - I wonder if that remains the case?
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM