Board index ‹ Super League ‹ Wakefield Trinity Wildcats ‹ u20's versus Wigan Warriors

[El Rey]

Either put specific points forward or leave the thread alone, you are taking in riddles and have offered nothing other that "respect" and "moron" hardly pointing out what the gripe is.

If you have valid claims/points contact the club.

Lets see if the ref has got any balls and we will leave it at that.

[El Rey]

I can only presume he did not see eye to eye with the official, in which case its best left alone.

The point is that however poor the refereeing decisions are, the coach shouldn't be approaching the ref at half time. He could have easily got himself sent from the field for the 2nd half. The decisions have been made and however controversial are not going to be reversed, so the coach should accept them, as the Wakey players did at the time.

The penalty count wasn't high because of lack of discipline or respect, but because the ref was incompetent, this not being the first time we have been on the end of this particular refs strange decisions.

To say Morrison is a moron and should be banned is just ridiculous.

Ice Queen wrote:

The point is that however poor the refereeing decisions are, the coach shouldn't be approaching the ref at half time. He could have easily got himself sent from the field for the 2nd half. The decisions have been made and however controversial are not going to be reversed, so the coach should accept them, as the Wakey players did at the time.

The penalty count wasn't high because of lack of discipline or respect, but because the ref was incompetent, this not being the first time we have been on the end of this particular refs strange decisions.

To say Morrison is a moron and should be banned is just ridiculous.

So when the ref dose his review of the game i bet there are no more than 2 mistakes by the ref out of the 34 penalty's

Glenn was making a point about the chicken wing tackle that went un-penalised and wanted to discuss this with the ref at half time to which he is entitled to do so, he did not "Chase him down" the ref was walking off next to Glenn but rudely just waved him away and dismissed him, I think you'll find that the only complaint going in will be from Wakefield about the ref and not the reverse

financialtimes wrote:

Glenn was making a point about the chicken wing tackle that went un-penalised and wanted to discuss this with the ref at half time to which he is entitled to do so, he did not "Chase him down" the ref was walking off next to Glenn but rudely just waved him away and dismissed him, I think you'll find that the only complaint going in will be from Wakefield about the ref and not the reverse

Nothing wrong with asking but being abusive different story

hare&hounds wrote:

So when the ref dose his review of the game i bet there are no more than 2 mistakes by the ref out of the 34 penalty's

Your not offering a constructive argument, "Mammy's bored now"

ban him now

hare&hounds wrote:

Nothing wrong with asking but being abusive different story

He wasn't abusive, I was there and 5m from the conversation

Where as you were probably at home taking an afternnon nap after your lunchtime bottle