Board index ‹ Super League ‹ Hull FC - blackandwhites.co.uk ‹ McGoldrick....

Fooking awful signing. Thoroughly disappointed. I can't think of a worse player we could have brought to the club.

Oh, and, I can't believe people are still doubting Whiting's ability to hold down a back row spot. What the fook does he have to do?

The Hollywood Frasier wrote:

By Martin I was meaning Tony Martin not Martin Aspinwall.

Has a great engine ? I have never heard anybody use that phrase to describe a fullback or 6.
.

really ?? the SOO pundits said slater has the best engine in world footie , parlance to mean he is an 80 min footballer in my op....
and both martin and aspinwall did well in my opinion

[Roland_R]

thehullwhitestar wrote:

On the back of Sunday's inspiring RH interview, this signing is as baffling as it is appalling. Young quality British signings and top quality experienced players? WTF is going on?

He is one of the worst players in one of SL's worst teams.

This is more embarrassing than the domestic violence support followed by the Reardon signing.

Tony Martin was a very poor signing but THIS is incredible. I bet AP isn't aware of the fans obvious reaction to this and how it could easily hit his pocket.

You've lost me on how you can compare this to the Reardon signing, the club pulled out and got rid of Reardon before it cost them £££ with a certain third party organisation.

As for the signing of McGoldrick a lot of unhappy people. Everyone is entitled to there opinion's don't get me wrong, but let's judge him on his performances in a Black and White shirt.

On another note, will he be eligible for next week's game in France? I presume so?

Rock God X wrote:

Fooking awful signing. Thoroughly disappointed. I can't think of a worse player we could have brought to the club.

Oh, and, I can't believe people are still doubting Whiting's ability to hold down a back row spot. What the fook does he have to do?

william shakespear arrives

Roland_R wrote:

.

On another note, will he be eligible for next week's game in France? I presume so?

I'm expecting him to play tomorrow

Roland_R wrote:

You've lost me on how you can compare this to the Reardon signing, the club pulled out and got rid of Reardon before it cost them £££ with a certain third party organisation.
As for the signing of McGoldrick a lot of unhappy people. Everyone is entitled to there opinion's don't get me wrong, but let's judge him on his performances in a Black and White shirt.
?

at last some sense in the thread
if he turns into a try machine or has outstanding perfs from the off then well done PG
cmon lets all get a grip they have not signed him because they think he is poop have they!!!!

[Roland_R]

clubfoot fc wrote:

I'm expecting him to play tomorrow

In replacement of Moa? If the "injury" is factual?

clubfoot fc wrote:

I'm expecting him to play tomorrow

hope so we are thin on experience and we need grunt presently thats without a doubt

Roland_R wrote:

In replacement of Moa? If the "injury" is factual?

has any announcement been made on the injury??

[Roland_R]

voodooroo wrote:

at last some sense in the thread
if he turns into a try machine or has outstanding perfs from the off then well done PG
cmon lets all get a grip they have not signed him because they think he is poop have they!!!!

People's problems are that they expect us to go all out and bust the salary cap. McGoldrick is not part of the "6" signings that Pearson mentioned.
I think he's an half decent addition, Gentle obviously feel's he adds some form of dimension to our squad which we definitely lack at current. He clearly adds more then Ellis, and anybody who fail's to see that should stop watching Rugby League. Cause they've clearly not been watching Jamie Ellis play this season!!!