Board index ‹ Super League ‹ Warrington Wolves ‹ exiles game

I'll be honest and say I haven't watched any of the games this year (not through lack of interest just the way it turned out.)

But looking from afar I fear this is another idea that will be binned in true RL style before it has had a chance to develop or even be given a chance. I think what the Exiles approach highlights is the lack a strategy at the RFL - is there actually a plan around the Exiles how to develop the concept etc?

Given, Australia and NZ didn't want to play us this year I'm not sure what other alternative there was. It should also be remembered that it is one of the few opportunities for the RFL to generate some revenue.

I think the Exiles games should be marketed on Sky as Super League All Star week - with an Exiles game being the crescendo - you could have a series of magazine style programmes to find who is the best goalkicker, quickest, strongest etc. Base it in London and play the Exiles game there - have an open training camp with the England and Exiles squads in Hyde Park. Hype the thing and it also feeds your expansion strategy.

Do that for Years 1,2 and 3. Years 4 and 5 the aim should be to expand into a 3 game series.

The fact that it isn't as good as the Australian SOO should have no impact on whether people go - my favourite sport is motor racing, the BTCC is the best supported national series in this country by a mile but the overall standard of drivers and teams is poor to very average especially when compared to DTM, V8 Supercars or even WTCC - it doesn't stop 30k people going to watch every other weekend.

I think the international game needs Great Britain to make a comeback.

It would strenghten the home nations.

You coluld still play for Ireland, Scotland and Wales but also still have the opportunity to play for GB against the Aussies and Kiwis.

[wolfinwidnes]

who thought of the bright idea to put it on the same day as SOO3 really made it look even duller especially as i watched the full match of SOO3 before the exiles match and probably made a dull game even duller!

one bright point was ratch got the opportunity to show what he can do shame he shares the position with ratboy! however from the showing he gave last night he deserves a shot in his more comfortable position in the halves.

and i must say i am intrigued by the elite vs knights concept could be similar to what NSW use the city vs country game for and would have at least a little competition IF they knew it was genuinely used to pick players for the world cups 4nations etc

It doesn’t work! There’s no passion for the players or the fans. Ditch it, as a bad idea, for a start it’s a crap time to have the games, just before the CC semi-finals, and at a critical time for the play-off standings. Why not have the games after the GF, it could be the battle of the coaches, The winning coach from the GF gets to pick a side from all SL players available, Steve Smacknamara picks his England side, and the other chooses his from what’s left. The GF coach’s team gets the support from that coach’s following plus the ones who don’t like McNamara. It also puts pressure on McNamara to prove what a great coach he is!

Rock 'n' Roll.

I am here on holidays from Australia and I actually enjoyed the experience. No the standard was not good but I am glad I went for several reasons. It was good to see Beaver go around one more time even if he is 38 and well past it.

Joel Monhagan is still a quality winger and would make it into most NRL sides.

I don't understand why, after promoting the game as a serious competition, the English Rugby League then fiddled around with selections instead of picking their best team and going all out to win. Surely that sent sent the message to the English players that it was more of a selection trial.

IMO the only way this thing will work is if the fans know it is going to be a fair dinkum game and not an exhibition match. That would have to start with picking the most competetive English team possible and making this series a priority over club matches. If that can't be done then it won't work.

I would have thought losing that game was worse for English rugby league than any benifits in blooding young players. Surely it is a game England could have won with their best players totally motivated.

It took an Australian to state the problem with this. Everything MeatyMeaty says is true. It is marketed as a big deal but England play a second rate side. It is the second game of a 2 game series. Whats the point? Surely you need to have a 1 or 3 game series? Then you can guarantee that someone will actually bloody win the thing.

meatymeaty wrote:

I don't understand why, after promoting the game as a serious competition, the English Rugby League then fiddled around with selections instead of picking their best team and going all out to win. Surely that sent sent the message to the English players that it was more of a selection trial.

IMO the only way this thing will work is if the fans know it is going to be a fair dinkum game and not an exhibition match. That would have to start with picking the most competetive English team possible and making this series a priority over club matches. If that can't be done then it won't work.

I would have thought losing that game was worse for English rugby league than any benifits in blooding young players. Surely it is a game England could have won with their best players totally motivated.

Jackpot. Can we get you to write a letter to the RFL?