Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:33 am Posts: 15828 Location: The Shaky Isles
Boyne wrote:
Who are the 'many' who are 'sick and tired' of GF repeating the same points over and over again?
Jaybs, Tre Cool, PC PLum, rosetintedspecs & Torbreck in this thread............I think that having a pop at me helps them take their minds off the fact that I am right and the club is in the shi77er.......I am happy to be of assistance
3 weeks 'til Wigan come a calling....just so we're clear about this, here are the ten lowest attendances for Wigan.......the average is 5,277 over 19 league games so far. 2007 = 3,200 1999 = 3,737 2009 = 3,883 2003 = 3,984 2006 = 4,115 2004 = 4,151 2002 = 4,284 2004 = 4,352 2000 = 4,351 2011 = 4,423
dally messenger wrote:
was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:
You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
Who are the 'many' who are 'sick and tired' of GF repeating the same points over and over again?
gutterfax wrote:
Jaybs, Tre Cool, PC PLum, rosetintedspecs & Torbreck in this thread............I think that having a pop at me helps them take their minds off the fact that I am right and the club is in the shi77er.......I am happy to be of assistance
Eh? I have no issue with your stats or posts and quite enjoy reading many of them Looking forward to the Wigan game (and a possible record SL defeat to us) & promise never, ever to post an attendance figure again
If Powell is going at the end of the season, then the club should announce it now. Reading the comments on facebook and here, it would seem that a fair few of the 900 or so ST holders are not going to renew..........
I think you may be correct and it is a good chance that there will be a few who have been long standing supporters. For the first time that I have known a few that I know attend left early on Saturday and this was a first.
Jaybs, Tre Cool, PC PLum, rosetintedspecs & Torbreck in this thread............I think that having a pop at me helps them take their minds off the fact that I am right and the club is in the shi77er.......I am happy to be of assistance
It is not "having a pop" GF it is just telling you that we know the club is in a total mess as we all keep saying ourseves, but we don't need constant lectures about it, that is all! you go on and on, many of us have been with the club from the start and we know what has gone on and Yes we are sick and fed up!
I enjoyed the kids playing before the game and at half-time, if only coz it shows how some people can enjoy the game. We seem doomed to watch this pitiful excuse of a side indefinitely, if DH told us we were getting rid of RP at least we could see a glimmer of hope on the horizon. Communication between the club and fans has hot an all time low.
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:42 am Posts: 746 Location: Colchester
We actually looked a well-coached side for a good proportion of Saturday's game - in control of field position and able to build pressure. Some good individual performances and the Gower-Bailey combo looked good. But there ends the good news.
To my mind, it was the selection/use of players that was the major problem. 3 centres used - Lovell, JOC and Channing; 2 of those probably won't ever make it at centre, the third is a decent prospect but needs easing into an established playing structure. Like someone else said, the use of JOC at left centre made no sense when Howell was available. (Just on JOC - he has been appalling and he looks shorn of any belief. He could still be a good winger/FB but he needed taking out of first grade at least 12 games ago).
So, no surprises that we eventually get battered via the centre/3rd man in channels.
Re. forwards. I don't understand why Channing came on at right centre and Lovell got moved to left second-row when Gower left the pitch. Surely - surely - the sensible move would have been Bolger on and not Channing. Don't think Bolger got any game time. And I don't understand the (under-)use of Krasniqi. The kid comes on and makes a line break with his first carry and then hits the ball up a couple more times; about 8 minutes on and then off, not to reappear. He looked devastated when hauled off. The kid is a coach's dream. Runs hard, PTB quickly, mobile, aggressive defender. If I could be arsed, I'd pull up his stats and compare them with Bryant and Wheeldon - he makes more metres per carry and is a better defender than both. I don't get it.
EDIT: Haha. Just realised Bolger was 18th man. Still Bolger on the bench before Channing would have made more sense.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM