Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 9:27 pm Posts: 1568 Location: Manchester
Judder Man wrote:
Its just shows how bad the superleague standard is at the moment, our Saints Team is probably the worst ever since Superleague 1
If only we had anything even close to Newlove and Gibbs in the centres, the teams tactics would totally change. No team is even in the same league in that department.
McClennan wrote:
Because we let him.
Exactly, he should have been annihilated out of the game as per the first half hour until Flannery came on and started the rot.
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 12:22 pm Posts: 3409 Location: I'm on the top of the world looking down on creation.
SaintsFan wrote:
Gaskell didn't kick once in the second half, for instance. It was all Lomax and Wilkin.
He did, actually. Quite a few times (if you were in the West Stand, you may not have noticed as he was generally kicking when we were pegged back deep; I was in the South Stand, about on a line 10m from the east end tryline)
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:43 pm Posts: 14887 Location: Somewhere other than here
Webbo wrote:
He did, actually. Quite a few times (if you were in the West Stand, you may not have noticed as he was generally kicking when we were pegged back deep; I was in the South Stand, about on a line 10m from the east end tryline)
Ah, that is why then. No, I only saw Lomax and Wilkin kicking. My bad.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
He didn't 'fade away'. Wilkin took over duties. Gaskell didn't kick once in the second half, for instance. It was all Lomax and Wilkin. Looked to me very much like a coaching decision.
I have to say that is tosh. We were wonderful for the first 30 minutes last night. Coincidentally, perhaps, we were wonderful until the heavens opened! But aside from that, we have looked exactly the same at times throughout the season regardless of who has played at halfback. Remember Widnes away in the CC or Wigan at Magic (or indeed at any time this season)? Or perhaps Hull FC away? All of those had Lomax and Hohaia in the halves. We didn't exactly shine in any of them did we?
You should take up coaching - I didn't realise that the sole purpose of the standoff was to kick the football - that probably where Fittler and Thurston are / were going wrong. Personally I thought they were there to guide the team around the park - silly me.
As for tosh - Widnes in the CC when we fell apart, was after Roby was sent off and Lance went to hooker. As for Hull Gasky came on for the last 20 minutes and Lance went to hooker again. Apart from the Wigan games we have on the whole been performing very well in the halves - despite the fact that Scapegoat 2012 has been playing stand-off for the majority.
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:43 pm Posts: 14887 Location: Somewhere other than here
steve wrote:
You should take up coaching - I didn't realise that the sole purpose of the standoff was to kick the football - that probably where Fittler and Thurston are / were going wrong. Personally I thought they were there to guide the team around the park - silly me.
You should take up reading. You may then realise what I actually said, or don't you know what 'for instance' means?
As for tosh - Widnes in the CC when we fell apart, was after Roby was sent off and Lance went to hooker. As for Hull Gasky came on for the last 20 minutes and Lance went to hooker again. Apart from the Wigan games we have on the whole been performing very well in the halves - despite the fact that Scapegoat 2012 has been playing stand-off for the majority.
You've conveniently skipped how great we were for the first 30 minutes on Friday night but no matter, if you just want to brush over our progressively worse performances against Wigan this season as if they meant nothing AND ignore our tremendous start against Hull KR then please do. Either way, your reply does not disprove my point.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:43 pm Posts: 14887 Location: Somewhere other than here
Good result for us from the Hull-Hudds match. With Hull winning, we are two points clear of the next batch. Hudds/Leeds/Hull are now all on 22 points, although Hull have a game in hand.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:34 pm Posts: 2872 Location: St Helens in Cumbria
SaintsFan wrote:
Good result for us from the Hull-Hudds match. With Hull winning, we are two points clear of the next batch. Hudds/Leeds/Hull are now all on 22 points, although Hull have a game in hand.
Hull are in their period of tough matches now so they might drop a game or two. If we can beat Huddersfield next home game we might open up some points space with the teams below us. Catalans are going into a tough period as well, can see us being on equal points right up to the last couple of games.
The new dynasty of super saints is coming to a ground near you. Ashe-Lomax--Charnock-Gaskell-Jones-Makinson-Swift-Walmsley, not Eastmond...the future is coming.
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:43 pm Posts: 4380 Location: Leeds, UK
Hull and Catalan have to play each other 2 times quite close together because of the game that was post-poned at the start of the year.
You'd expect Catalan to win the game in France but at the KC, that may get turned around. Which would be good for us. We need Catalan to lose a game, to let us have our destiny in our own hands when we come to play them. Same for the Wire.
It's getting to that squeaky bum time and teams will in the top 8 will be taking points off each other here and there. This weekend has been close to perfect for Saints results wise. I did not expect Wakey to over turn Catalan. But once we have played Catalan and Wire, from a terrible start we could be in an even better position than we were at this point last year.
edit: forgot Wire and Catalan play each other next week. It's a win win for Saint that one, who would we rather lose?????
A halfback, a halfback, my kingdom for a halfback!!!!!!!
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM