Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:22 pm Posts: 1318 Location: Kirkstall, Leeds
El Barbudo wrote:
Eh? I can see past the small typo (mug = smug)
Thanks, I've edited it now.
but I haven't a clue what you mean.
That quote is attributed to a very famous enemy of God. That individual will recently have had to give an account of himself. He will have had to explain his blasphemy, drunkenness, homosexual flings etc.
The Bible tells us that there is a Heaven and and Hell. I wonder which one he is in
Status: ONLINE Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 10:49 am Posts: 35759 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Rooster Booster wrote:
Do you think your post may offend some people?
No, do you and if so, why?
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Status: ONLINE Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 10:49 am Posts: 35759 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
kirkstaller wrote:
The Bible tells us that there is a Heaven and and Hell. I wonder which one he is in
Neither.
I hate to shatter your illusions but his remains are probably in a (or some) laboratory fridge, after he donated his body to medical science. As an antitheist, he believed in neither heaven nor hell
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:22 pm Posts: 1318 Location: Kirkstall, Leeds
cod'ead wrote:
Neither.
I hate to shatter your illusions but his remains are probably in a (or some) laboratory fridge, after he donated his body to medical science. As an antitheist, he believed in neither heaven nor hell
Non-belief in something doesn't make it go away.
If a judge sentences a man to death, is he saved if he doesn't believe in the electric chair? Of course not. Hell exists whether you believe in it or not.
Sadly, I would guess that Hitchens is there right now.
As for evidence, by the far most convincing is the daily spiritual relationship I have with Jesus.
One person's fervent belief/delusion does not constitute evidence. There are people in mental hospitals the world over who believe that they are Napoleon/Elvis/Florence Nightingale just as strongly as you believe that Jesus exists. The strength of their belief does not prove to anyone other than themselves that what they're saying is true.
kirkstaller wrote:
Second is the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.
Let's assume for a second that there is conclusive proof of a man named Jesus who lived in Nazareth around 2,000 years ago, upon whose life/teachings the Christian religion is founded. No such proof exists, but I'm willing to overlook that fact for the sake of argument. Proof that Jesus the man existed still wouldn't be proof that he was the Son of God, that he performed any of his impressive parlour tricks, or that he was born of a virgin mother. It most certainly wouldn't prove the existence of God. Does the fact that we can prove L. Ron Hubbard's existence mean that Scientology is true?
kirkstaller wrote:
Third, the creation which surrounds us.
What surrounds us has been shown by science not to have been created in anything like the way The Bible describes. Evolution, to take but one example, is a hard fact. All of the available evidence supports it. Man being created by God, on the other hand, is not supported by a single shred of evidence. Your Bible is so far wide of the mark, it even states that God separated the light and the dark before he made the objects that actually emit light.
Christianity: because you're so awful you made God kill himself.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM