Paul T - HKR wrote:
Whoa! Don't
the messenger. The use of the term 'ceiling' is from a reliable source at Rovers.
If you recall you outlined a tiered-model on how you figured the Salary Cap operated. In many respects each of those tiers operated within a band-width and as such a ceiling. Whilst I don't believe Rovers have a rigid model it makes sense to me your hypothesis wasn't far off the mark, and if my source is right CP fits into the 2nd tier.
For the record, I do not know what CPs contract is worth with Rovers, and I was actually questioning the reports that he was on mega bucks in Oz and then referencing it to Roopys evaluation of CP.
the messenger. The use of the term 'ceiling' is from a reliable source at Rovers. If you recall you outlined a tiered-model on how you figured the Salary Cap operated. In many respects each of those tiers operated within a band-width and as such a ceiling. Whilst I don't believe Rovers have a rigid model it makes sense to me your hypothesis wasn't far off the mark, and if my source is right CP fits into the 2nd tier.
For the record, I do not know what CPs contract is worth with Rovers, and I was actually questioning the reports that he was on mega bucks in Oz and then referencing it to Roopys evaluation of CP.
I'm not
ing, sorry if it came across as terse. I pretty much agree with all of your post, above.
'Ceiling' just sounds a bit rigid to me and I wouldn't want CS's hands tieing, certainly not at £70k or even £85k. That said, our key playmakers - Dobson and Green - are already in place, so we might well be only making 'second tier' signings this year.




