Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:25 pm Posts: 3783 Location: Polishing the CC with Susanna Reid, laughing at Kevin Sinfeld's titty lip
It's Friday
It's Five to Five
It's time for....
a Phil Clarke thread
It's finished at Sunderland. Manchester United have done all they can. That Rooney goal was good enough for the three points. Manchester City are still alive here. Balotelli.....AGUERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:10 am Posts: 1472 Location: wireland
i was calling no try for that then phil clarke made a lot of sense (shudder) all angles have to prove that it isn't a try and one angle wasnt conclusive so benifit of the doubt goes to the attacker
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:03 pm Posts: 248 Location: The Top 8
2 angles show no try then the side on angle shows he had downward pressure so i think that one angle was conclusive and also benefit of the doubt would have been sufficent
The Wire and Tranmere Rovers you can't go wrong
Rogues Gallery wrote:
A very good friend of mine always uses this line.
"If Saints were playing for my life, I'd still want them to lose"
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:47 pm Posts: 504 Location: Great Britain; Greater Manchester
karetaker wrote:
3 minutes into tonights game he had to mention wigan do something better than anyone else,im sure im watching HKR V Catalan?
2minutes 38seconds. I watched the game with a semiWigan fan who is sick of me talking about Phil loving Clarke and his Wigan propaganda. But even he said last night "didn't take Phil Clarke long to drop the name [Wigan] into the ring, did it?" I'm sick of him!
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:13 am Posts: 153 Location: EAST HULL IS WONDERFUL
Surely if two angles show that there was daylight between hand and ball, then there was daylight! Also, all angles didn't prove that Hornes attempt was 'no try' so where was benefit of doubt there?
''RALLY ROUND''
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM